-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.1k
Fix: Variadic function cast causing segfaults on Apple ARM64 #2708
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
bjorng
merged 1 commit into
erlang:maint
from
tehprofessor:erts/apple-silicon-variadic-fix-maint
Aug 13, 2020
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think I've got everything updated correctly. The one thing I'm not entirely sure of is if this should be copied into
bif_args, if this is an optimization for this specific case, or something else? I'm new toc; so, if I'm understanding this correctly,esp-1works here without copying intobif_argsbecauseesp-1andbif_args[0]essentially point to the same value and both are pointers so semantically it's all good? Then by not copying intobif_args[0]we save an allocation/step?And, please feel free to tell me to just google more 😄 !
Thank you both for your time reviewing this, and please let me know if there's anything else I can change, improve, or have missed 😅 here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The copying of the arguments to
bif_argswhen there are 2 or 3 arguments is only necessary because the arguments would be in the wrong order if we would passesp-2oresp-3, respectively. When there is a single argument, there is no need to copy it because it can't be in the wrong order.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you @bjorng