You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We will need to implement and document some new values of @type on <witDetail>, namely
"unmetrical" — display A (unm.)
"silemn" — display A (sil. em.)
@michaelnmmeyer : what if a reading is both unmetrical and a silent emendation? Is it possible to allow more than one value on @type? Or to allow more than on @type on <witDetail>?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
we will also need to allow one of the following two options for representing that a previous edition emended but that our editions rejects the emendation:
I have added "unmetrical", "silemn" and "emn" as allowed values of witDetail/@type in the schema. For the display, it would be too much work to straighten out what we have now, and this is going to be scrapped anyway, so I will just write the new code.
To answer your questions:
what if a reading is both unmetrical and a silent emendation?
It is not possible to use several @type. The way to go, if we follow the TEI documentation, is to use several consecutive witDetail:
So far, we have not allowed @type on <rdg>. We should discuss pros and cons of allowing it.
From what I have gathered so far while reading the TEI documentation, your two options are equivalent. The second option (@type on rdg) could be used as shorthand.
We will need to implement and document some new values of @type on
<witDetail>
, namely@michaelnmmeyer : what if a reading is both unmetrical and a silent emendation? Is it possible to allow more than one value on @type? Or to allow more than on @type on
<witDetail>
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: