-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 323
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for Is_In
and Not_In
to Filter_Condition
#3790
Merged
mergify
merged 28 commits into
develop
from
wip/radeusgd/filter-condition-is-in-183389945
Oct 15, 2022
Merged
Changes from 26 commits
Commits
Show all changes
28 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9c54cf1
Add Is_In and Not_In to base types
radeusgd e24b762
checkpoint
radeusgd cea9198
Initial fallback implementation, some basic tests
radeusgd 727de68
checkpoint
radeusgd 381a57e
Abstract-out numeric conversions, implement specializations for Text …
radeusgd a5e988f
Add more tests, implement other specializations
radeusgd 77826c5
Implement vectorized is_in for booleans too
radeusgd 8e42f5e
Add tests for Integer-Decimal cross-equality and fix these
radeusgd 96fcbe9
Implement Database IN
radeusgd d872af4
Fixes
radeusgd e6f1e63
Formatting
radeusgd 862bb2f
Actually measure efficiency of Table.filter Is_In
radeusgd fe7e7fc
changelog
radeusgd 0f9f1a6
cr: modulus
radeusgd ba2098b
cr: make is_in and like public - improving docs
radeusgd 845fc58
Add tests for Is_In on boolean columns
radeusgd 5295c81
Add a test checking the masking implementation of various columns
radeusgd a81e0c5
fix a bug in BoolStorage::applyMask
radeusgd 94e8c36
Much more robust boolean tests, more efficient boolean operation
radeusgd 66dfe91
cr: rename internal ops to have underscores
radeusgd 41b262e
obsolete TODO
radeusgd 6ac4e36
move tests around, new placement is more reasonable
radeusgd 2e42d68
Generify SpecializedIsInOp
radeusgd e2b77c9
Simplify TypedStorage
radeusgd eb120cc
Make Storage aware of its (boxed) storage type
radeusgd bc5b520
formatting
radeusgd 139366c
Merge branch 'develop' into wip/radeusgd/filter-condition-is-in-18338…
mergify[bot] ae84e89
fixes after rebase
radeusgd File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think this
parser
project is used at all, I think it was a prototype of the Rust integration, superseded by the new Rust parser. Can we just remove the whole project? cc: @hubertp @jdunkerleyI removed this line in particular as
bench
config is not available for this project and cleaning it didn't work because of that. But if possible maybe we should remove it altogether if it is indeed unused.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like this can be removed. But maybe @JaroslavTulach can confirm since he is tinkering with the integration
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If it builds after removing the line feel free to remove it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The line yep, I was meaning about removing the whole subproject - it seems to me it's some old Rust parser integration effort (it's not the old parser still in use today, that's
syntax
) - which was superseded by yours effort and I don't think it is used anywhere. So I think we should ditch it altogether to avoid the maintenance.