Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The user should be able to remove duplicate elements from a Vector #3224

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 17, 2022

Conversation

radeusgd
Copy link
Member

@radeusgd radeusgd commented Jan 13, 2022

Pull Request Description

Important Notes

Checklist

Please include the following checklist in your PR:

  • The documentation has been updated if necessary.
  • All code conforms to the Scala, Java, and Rust style guides.
  • All documentation and configuration conforms to the markdown and YAML style guides.
  • All code has been tested where possible.

@radeusgd radeusgd self-assigned this Jan 13, 2022
@radeusgd radeusgd changed the title A library developer should be able to select matching names given a list The user should be able to remove duplicate elements from a Vector Jan 14, 2022
@jdunkerley
Copy link
Member

Given the issues with Atom structural comparison we will need to mark one of the tests as pending but otherwise this looks good.

@radeusgd radeusgd force-pushed the wip/radeusgd/vector-distinct-180899205 branch from 2140ed8 to bef07c4 Compare January 14, 2022 10:25
@radeusgd radeusgd marked this pull request as ready for review January 14, 2022 10:26
@jdunkerley
Copy link
Member

LGTM 👍

@radeusgd radeusgd force-pushed the wip/radeusgd/vector-distinct-180899205 branch from 93a7b97 to 43dae19 Compare January 14, 2022 12:10
@4e6 4e6 merged commit 66082ea into develop Jan 17, 2022
@4e6 4e6 deleted the wip/radeusgd/vector-distinct-180899205 branch January 17, 2022 09:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants