This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 10, 2022. It is now read-only.
Open
Conversation
MikeCamel
previously approved these changes
May 19, 2020
Contributor
MikeCamel
left a comment
MikeCamel
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I like this. Possible further work includes:
- access to encrypted data (where does the key come from?)
- access to networked data
- access to local storage data.
ueno
force-pushed
the
wip/dueno/workload-package-format
branch
from
40d4e91 to
c261d5f
Compare
ueno
force-pushed
the
wip/dueno/workload-package-format
branch
3 times, most recently
from
9246e39 to
1565ce7
Compare
ueno
added a commit
to ueno/enarx
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 26, 2020
This implements the proposal to embed application resources in the Wasm file through a custom section. For more details of see: enarx-archive/rfcs#29
ueno
added a commit
to ueno/enarx
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 26, 2020
This implements the proposal to embed application resources in the Wasm file through a custom section. For more details of see: enarx-archive/rfcs#29
ueno
added a commit
to ueno/enarx
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 26, 2020
This implements the proposal to embed application resources in the Wasm file through a custom section. For more details of see: enarx-archive/rfcs#29
ueno
added a commit
to ueno/enarx
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 26, 2020
This implements the proposal to embed application resources in the Wasm file through a custom section. For more details of see: enarx-archive/rfcs#29
ueno
force-pushed
the
wip/dueno/workload-package-format
branch
from
1565ce7 to
01dbf74
Compare
enarxbot
requested review from
MikeCamel,
ambaxter,
haraldh,
mbestavros,
npmccallum and
whitebrandy
MikeCamel
approved these changes
Jul 30, 2020
Contributor
MikeCamel
left a comment
MikeCamel
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good description - agree that we should keep looking at the options.
enarxbot
assigned
ambaxter,
connorkuehl,
haraldh,
mbestavros,
npmccallum and
whitebrandy
enarxbot
added
documentation
mbestavros
removed request for
ambaxter,
connorkuehl,
haraldh,
mbestavros,
npmccallum and
whitebrandy
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
9 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds an initial draft of WebAssembly workload format specification.
This is intended for discussion; I am even leaning toward the alternatives while writing :-)
Either way we decide I can try to implement it on top of enarx/enarx#502.
Fixes #17.