Skip to content

Assume that browser has working URL object #19283

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 3, 2023
Merged

Assume that browser has working URL object #19283

merged 1 commit into from
May 3, 2023

Conversation

sbc100
Copy link
Collaborator

@sbc100 sbc100 commented May 3, 2023

Perhaps 10 years ago there was possibility that the URL object didn't exist, but today we don't support such browsers

See https://caniuse.com/url.

This is a followup to #19277 which did the same for the Blob constructor.

@sbc100 sbc100 requested a review from kripken May 3, 2023 16:11
Perhaps 10 years ago there was possibility that the URL object didn't
exist, but today we don't support such browsers

See https://caniuse.com/url.

This is a followup to #19277 which did the same for the Blob
constructor.
@sbc100 sbc100 force-pushed the assume_url_object branch from 5312325 to 5778c5a Compare May 3, 2023 17:52
@sbc100 sbc100 enabled auto-merge (squash) May 3, 2023 18:00
@sbc100 sbc100 merged commit 5aee123 into main May 3, 2023
@sbc100 sbc100 deleted the assume_url_object branch May 3, 2023 19:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants