Fixed a regression that could cause a crash when looking for an ignoring comment for unsafe pseudo-classes #2864
Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 0a7f898 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
|
This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox. To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA. Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit 0a7f898:
|
| @@ -184,7 +307,7 @@ describe('unsafe pseudo classes', () => { | |||
| expect(console.error).not.toBeCalled() | |||
| }) | |||
|
|
|||
| test.only('does not warn when using the flag on the rule that preceeds a declaration', () => { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
My bad - I forgot to uncomment this and I've missed broken cases (tests added as part of this PR are new though, the crash didn't occur in the existing test suite but some expectations around those warnings were broken)
…ing comment for unsafe pseudo-classes
Codecov Report
|
fixes #2863