Issue 393 - TOC rearranging #459
Conversation
If merged into the octane branch, this PR resolves issue #393 by re-ordering the table of contents (as outlined in RFC 431).
|
Should this PR review & merge wait until we have pages for some of those topics? Anatomy of an app doesn't exist, for example. |
|
@jenweber we were thinking that we would add in the sections in the octane branch, even if the page has no content. We want to be able to see the content gaps easily. It's inline with the plan (https://emberjs.com/blog/2019/02/14/octane-guides.html) |
|
@MelSumner can I get your help with the merge conflicts? I am not confident about removing tutorials, since it necessitates infra work that I don't think we have time for before the preview. The others make sense to me. Can you share more about why you think tutorials should be removed at this stage? Thanks! |
|
locks explained that tutorials infra is mostly done already. Merged! 🎉 Thanks for your help! |
If merged into the octane branch, this PR resolves issue ember-learn#393 by re-ordering the table of contents (as outlined in RFC 431).
If merged into the octane branch, this PR resolves issue #393 by re-ordering the table of contents (as outlined in RFC 431).