Skip to content

Let's find where the first breakage is in the Ecto 2.0.0 tree. #7

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

scouten
Copy link

@scouten scouten commented Dec 27, 2016

No description provided.

@scouten scouten force-pushed the bisect-ecto-2 branch 3 times, most recently from 96cbbf7 to 26231c2 Compare December 27, 2016 02:43
Looks like sqlitex can only return structs containing column-name to value pairs and the new Ecto decode mechanism *really* wants simple lists.

May be time to cut sqlitex out of the loop?
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 30, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 87.742% when pulling 9b92723 on bisect-ecto-2 into bee5f37 on master.

@scouten scouten closed this Dec 30, 2016
@scouten scouten deleted the bisect-ecto-2 branch December 30, 2016 15:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants