Skip to content

Conversation

@bobleesj
Copy link
Collaborator

@bobleesj bobleesj commented Jan 8, 2026

What problem does this PR address?

For each PR, we want to ensure there is a tutorial notebook, tests written.

What should the reviewer(s) do?

Please review the content of the template. This template is currently used at https://github.com/scikit-package/scikit-package and has worked pretty well.

  • This PR affects internal functionality only (no user-facing change).

@bobleesj
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bobleesj commented Jan 8, 2026

@gvarnavi @cophus ready for review.

@arthurmccray
Copy link
Collaborator

maybe i'm missing something, but does the template mention writing tests?

@bobleesj
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@arthurmccray

maybe i'm missing something, but does the template mention writing tests?

yup, added per your feedback.

I realized that we have a quite diverse range of people contributing to this project and also maybe first-timers, so mentioning tests here can be useful while keeping the checklsit minimla. (of course writing tests is assumed amongst core contributors and this checklist is used as a mental "list" to go thru)

@bobleesj bobleesj closed this Jan 11, 2026
@bobleesj bobleesj deleted the pr-tmp branch January 11, 2026 06:56
@bobleesj bobleesj restored the pr-tmp branch January 11, 2026 06:56
@bobleesj bobleesj reopened this Jan 11, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants