Skip to content

[docs] explainer for java packaging tests #30825

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
119 changes: 119 additions & 0 deletions qa/vagrant/README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
# packaging tests

This project contains tests that verify the distributions we build work
correctly on the operating systems we support. They're intended to cover the
steps a user would take when installing and configuring an Elasticsearch
distribution. They're not intended to have significant coverage of the behavior
of Elasticsearch's features.

There are two types of tests in this project. The old tests live in
`src/test/` and are written in [Bats](https://github.com/sstephenson/bats),
which is a flavor of bash scripts that run as unit tests. These tests are
deprecated because Bats is unmaintained and cannot run on Windows.

The new tests live in `src/main/` and are written in Java. Like the old tests,
this project's tests are run inside the VM, not on your host. All new packaging
tests should be added to this set of tests if possible.

## Running these tests

See the section in [TESTING.asciidoc](../../TESTING.asciidoc#testing-packaging)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe move that section into here and link from there to here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense, what do you think @rjernst


## Adding a new test class

When gradle runs the packaging tests on a VM, it runs the full suite by
default. To add a test class to the suite, add its `class` to the
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does it run them in the order that they are declared? Maybe put that if it is true.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It does, I'll add that

`@SuiteClasses` annotation in [PackagingTests.java](src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/packaging/PackagingTests.java).
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I had not noticed this requirement before when reviewing. I think this will be very error prone, and we should change this in a followup. Randomized runner automatically finds the suites to invoke (iirc the ant runner is what finds the classes). I think we can do similar from gradle in generating the test shell script that invokes the test runner.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds good. I'm not sure if there's anything in junit 4 that does this out of the box but it shouldn't be too hard to get working

If a test class is added to the project but not to this annotation, it will not
run in CI jobs. The test classes are run in the order they are listed in the
annotation.

## Choosing which distributions to test

Distributions are represented by [enum values](src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/packaging/util/Distribution.java)
which know if they are compatible with the platform the tests are currently
running on. To skip a test if the distribution it's using isn't compatible with
the current platform, put this [assumption](https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/wiki/assumptions-with-assume)
in your test method or in a `@Before` method

```java
assumeTrue(distribution.packaging.compatible);
```

Similarly if you write a test that is intended only for particular platforms,
you can make an assumption using the constants and methods in [Platforms.java](src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/packaging/util/Platforms.java)

```java
assumeTrue("only run on windows", Platforms.WINDOWS);

assumeTrue("only run if using systemd", Platforms.isSystemd());
```

## Writing a test that covers multiple distributions

It seems like the way to do this that makes it the most straightforward to run
and reproduce specific test cases is to create a test case class with an
abstract method that provides the distribution

```java
public abstract class MyTestCase {
@Test
public void myTest() { /* do something with the value of #distribution() */ }
abstract Distribution distribution();
}
```

and then for each distribution you want to test, create a subclass

```java
public class MyTestDefaultTar extends MyTestCase {
@Override
Distribution distribution() { return Distribution.DEFAULT_TAR; }
}
```

That way when a test fails the user gets told explicitly that `MyTestDefaultTar`
failed, and to reproduce it they should run that class. See [ArchiveTestCase](src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/packaging/test/ArchiveTestCase.java)
and its children for an example of this.

## Running external commands

In general it's probably best to avoid running external commands when a good
Java alternative exists. For example most filesystem operations can be done with
the java.nio.file APIs. For those that aren't, use an instance of [Shell](src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/packaging/util/Shell.java)

Despite the name, commands run with this class are not run in a shell, and any
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there any reason it couldn't be run in a shell? The Shell ctor could take the shell to run, ie bash or powershell? Otherwise I think we should rename Shell to Command or something similar, as it it would be too confusing.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah that makes sense. Running commands in bash is probably less likely to have weird issues, and we'll be wanting to run all the windows stuff in powershell anyway. I'll make a follow up for this

familiar features of shells like variables or expansion won't work.

If you do need the shell, you must explicitly invoke the shell's command. For
example to run a command with Bash, use the `bash -c command` syntax. Note that
the entire script must be in a single string argument

```java
Shell sh = new Shell();
sh.run("bash", "-c", "echo $foo; echo $bar");
```

Similary for powershell - again, the entire powershell script must go in a
single string argument

```java
sh.run("powershell.exe", "-Command", "Write-Host $foo; Write-Host $bar");
```

On Linux, most commands you'll want to use will be executable files and will
work fine without a shell

```java
sh.run("tar", "-xzpf", "elasticsearch-6.1.0.tar.gz");
```

On Windows you'll mostly want to use powershell as it can do a lot more and
gives much better feedback than Windows' legacy command line. Unfortunately that
means that you'll need to use the `powershell.exe -Command` syntax as
powershell's [Cmdlets](https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms714395.aspx)
don't correspond to executable files and are not runnable by `Runtime` directly.

When writing powershell commands this way, make sure to test them as some types
of formatting can cause it to return a successful exit code but not run
anything.
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -31,8 +31,7 @@
import static org.elasticsearch.packaging.util.Cleanup.cleanEverything;
import static org.elasticsearch.packaging.util.Archives.installArchive;
import static org.elasticsearch.packaging.util.Archives.verifyArchiveInstallation;
import static org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers.is;
import static org.junit.Assume.assumeThat;
import static org.junit.Assume.assumeTrue;

/**
* Tests that apply to the archive distributions (tar, zip). To add a case for a distribution, subclass and
Expand All @@ -54,7 +53,7 @@ public static void cleanup() {

@Before
public void onlyCompatibleDistributions() {
assumeThat(distribution().packaging.compatible, is(true));
assumeTrue("only compatible distributions", distribution().packaging.compatible);
}

@Test
Expand Down