Add missing hash fields to process.parent #698
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
marshallmain
force-pushed
the
add-parent-hash
branch
from
002531d to
d48e89b
Compare
|
Huge thanks for submitting this @marshallmain 💯 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Recently process.parent fields that are identical to the process fields were added to ECS, but the hash fields that are nested under "process" did not get added to process.parent. This PR adds "process.parent" to the list of nestings in "hash" and also support for nesting fields at levels other than the top level of the destination schema using the '.' notation (e.g. process.parent). Previously nested fields could only be inserted at the top level.