Skip to content

Clarify url.query usage to specify full query string format #2488

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

johnmschoonover
Copy link

This update removes ambiguity around the url.query field by explicitly stating that it should contain the full query string, including compound parameters.

An example with multiple query parameters is added to reinforce this guidance. This helps prevent misinterpretation—such as splitting the query into an array of keywords—and promotes consistent, ECS-compliant implementations across ingestion pipelines and tools.

  • Have you signed the contributor license agreement?
  • Have you followed the contributor guidelines?
  • For proposing substantial changes or additions to the schema, have you reviewed the RFC process?
  • If submitting code/script changes, have you verified all tests pass locally using make test?
  • If submitting schema/fields updates, have you generated new artifacts by running make and committed those changes?
  • Is your pull request against main? Unless there is a good reason otherwise, we prefer pull requests against main and will backport as needed.
  • Have you added an entry to the CHANGELOG.next.md?

This update removes ambiguity around the url.query field by explicitly stating that it should contain the full query string, including compound parameters.

An example with multiple query parameters is added to reinforce this guidance. This helps prevent misinterpretation—such as splitting the query into an array of keywords—and promotes consistent, ECS-compliant implementations across ingestion pipelines and tools.
@johnmschoonover johnmschoonover requested a review from a team as a code owner June 5, 2025 18:35
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 5, 2025

🤖 GitHub comments

Expand to view the GitHub comments

Just comment with:

  • run docs-build : Re-trigger the docs validation. (use unformatted text in the comment!)

Copy link

cla-checker-service bot commented Jun 5, 2025

💚 CLA has been signed

@johnmschoonover
Copy link
Author

run docs-build

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant