Cherry-pick #16667 to 7.6: Make memqueue.Broker internal (now memqueue.broker) #16684
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Cherry-pick of PR #16667 to 7.6 branch. Original message:
What does this PR do?
Cleanup:
memqueue.Brokeris not used anywhere outside thememqueuepackage except via its implementation of thequeue.Queueinterface. This PR makes it an explicitly internal type to better isolate the overall queue interface, and renames the associated functionNewBrokertoNewQueue.This does not introduce any functional changes (except to prevent future PRs from accidentally propagating or depending on this internal type).
Checklist
I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areasI have made corresponding changes to the documentationI have made corresponding change to the default configuration filesI have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works