Skip to content

Conversation

@masc2023
Copy link
Contributor

@masc2023 masc2023 commented Mar 21, 2025

process: add initial problem resolution process

Resolves #539

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 21, 2025

License Check Results

🚀 The license check job ran with the Bazel command:

bazel run //:license-check

Status: ⚠️ Needs Review

Click to expand output
[License Check Output]
2025/04/08 09:02:25 Downloading https://releases.bazel.build/7.4.0/release/bazel-7.4.0-linux-x86_64...
Extracting Bazel installation...
Starting local Bazel server and connecting to it...
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Loading: 
Loading: 0 packages loaded
Loading: 0 packages loaded
    currently loading: 
Analyzing: target //:license-check (1 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)
Analyzing: target //:license-check (1 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (89 packages loaded, 10 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (97 packages loaded, 10 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (127 packages loaded, 804 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (131 packages loaded, 827 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (143 packages loaded, 2207 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (145 packages loaded, 2465 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (145 packages loaded, 2465 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (149 packages loaded, 4611 targets configured)

INFO: Analyzed target //:license-check (150 packages loaded, 4737 targets configured).
[11 / 13] [Prepa] JavaToolchainCompileBootClasspath external/rules_java~/toolchains/platformclasspath.jar
[12 / 13] Building license.check.license_check.jar (); 0s multiplex-worker
INFO: Found 1 target...
Target //:license.check.license_check up-to-date:
  bazel-bin/license.check.license_check
  bazel-bin/license.check.license_check.jar
INFO: Elapsed time: 19.748s, Critical Path: 2.52s
INFO: 13 processes: 9 internal, 3 processwrapper-sandbox, 1 worker.
INFO: Build completed successfully, 13 total actions
INFO: Running command line: bazel-bin/license.check.license_check ./formatted.txt -review -project automotive.score -repo https://github.com/eclipse-score/score -token otyhZ4eaRYK1tKLNNF-Y
[main] INFO Querying Eclipse Foundation for license data for 76 items.
[main] INFO Found 52 items.
[main] INFO Querying ClearlyDefined for license data for 25 items.
[main] INFO Found 25 items.
[main] INFO License information could not be automatically verified for the following content:
[main] INFO 
[main] INFO pypi/pypi/-/docutils/0.21.2
[main] INFO 
[main] INFO This content is either not correctly mapped by the system, or requires review.
[main] INFO A review is required for pypi/pypi/-/docutils/0.21.2.
[main] INFO A review request already exists https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/emo-team/iplab/-/issues/19880 .

@github-actions
Copy link

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

@masc2023 masc2023 linked an issue Mar 21, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
4 tasks
@masc2023 masc2023 force-pushed the masc2023_add_prm branch 3 times, most recently from 90040ad to fcf4adf Compare March 28, 2025 12:37
@masc2023 masc2023 marked this pull request as ready for review March 28, 2025 12:41
@masc2023 masc2023 linked an issue Apr 1, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@masc2023 masc2023 self-assigned this Apr 1, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@aschemmel-tech aschemmel-tech left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

see inline comments

@masc2023 masc2023 force-pushed the masc2023_add_prm branch 2 times, most recently from a93cfe0 to 757cca5 Compare April 4, 2025 06:43
@masc2023 masc2023 requested a review from aschemmel-tech April 4, 2025 06:49
Copy link
Contributor

@aschemmel-tech aschemmel-tech left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Findings mostly fixed, two remain to discuss in community, one typo found additionally

@masc2023 masc2023 force-pushed the masc2023_add_prm branch 2 times, most recently from 96f82f6 to 99c1979 Compare April 8, 2025 06:27
Process template used to add initial prm
Platform Management Plan extended with Problem Resoltuion Managenemt Plan

Resolves: #539
@masc2023 masc2023 requested a review from aschemmel-tech April 8, 2025 09:02
Copy link
Contributor

@aschemmel-tech aschemmel-tech left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Open topic on how to document "stakeholder" in the bug issue postponed to #870

@masc2023 masc2023 merged commit f58356a into main Apr 8, 2025
10 checks passed
@masc2023 masc2023 deleted the masc2023_add_prm branch April 8, 2025 09:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Epic: (Initial) Problem Resolution Improvement: Document Problem Resolution process

5 participants