-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 76
process: initial documentation of verification #441
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
This is the porting of the work done in the incubator project. It includes the following artefacts, adopted to the latest syntax and checks for S-Core: - Guidance - Work Products - Report template - Requirement to test linking - Test case templates - S-Core verification plan draft Implements: #320 Also-by: @julian711 Signed-off-by: Philipp Ahmann <philipp.ahmann@de.bosch.com>
Implements: #320 Signed-off-by: Philipp Ahmann <philipp.ahmann@de.bosch.com>
|
The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html |
| ===================== | ||
|
|
||
| This guideline outlines the responsibilities and procedures for developers performing verification activities (test | ||
| case creation, inspection, and review) for S-Core documentation, Rust and C/C++ projects of the platform. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- should we leave out name "S-Core"?
- documentation + tooling? We also need some guidance to link our tools to process requirements for Tool Qualification
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
process requirements are still missing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
last part of process requirements added to issue #623
docs/process/process_areas/verification/guidance/verification_guidance.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/process/process_areas/verification/guidance/verification_guidance.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/process/process_areas/verification/guidance/verification_guidance.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/process/process_areas/verification/guidance/verification_guidance.rst
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| - valid | invalid | ||
| - | ||
| - | ||
| * - TestType |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Provide more examples including description
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Test type descriptions like for boundary analysis is a topic which will be discussed within testing community (and documented in process).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added this finding to issue #623
docs/process/process_areas/verification/guidance/verification_guidance.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/process/process_areas/verification/_assets/requirements_workflow_verification.svg
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/process/process_areas/verification/guidance/verification_templates.rst
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/process/process_areas/verification/guidance/verification_report_template.rst
Show resolved
Hide resolved
aschemmel-tech
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
see inline comments, first iteration
Implements: #320 Signed-off-by: Philipp Ahmann <philipp.ahmann@de.bosch.com>
|
@hoe-jo this commit in #441 is for you: workproducts: update verification and requirements I removed some duplicated items and added the requirements inspection to your work products, as you already have the template for it. |
0d24a0a to
e40ca7b
Compare
docs/process/process_areas/verification/guidance/verification_report_template.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Implements: #320 Signed-off-by: Philipp Ahmann <Philipp.Ahmann@de.bosch.com>
Implements: #320 Signed-off-by: Philipp Ahmann <Philipp.Ahmann@de.bosch.com>
docs/process/process_areas/verification/guidance/verification_specification.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/process/process_areas/verification/guidance/verification_specification.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/process/process_areas/verification/guidance/verification_specification.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/process/process_areas/verification/guidance/verification_specification.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
@aschemmel-tech kindly do a review on the current state. I should have addressed all your pending concerns. Missing part for final commit on this PR will be the transfer of TODOs into improvement issue(s). |
docs/process/process_areas/verification/verification_concept.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/process/process_areas/verification/verification_concept.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/process/process_areas/verification/verification_concept.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/process/process_areas/verification/verification_concept.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/process/process_areas/verification/verification_concept.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/process/process_areas/verification/verification_concept.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Implements: #320 Signed-off-by: Philipp Ahmann <Philipp.Ahmann@de.bosch.com>
Signed-off-by: Philipp Ahmann <Philipp.Ahmann@de.bosch.com>
|
@aschemmel-tech, from my perspective we are ready to merge. 🎉 |
aschemmel-tech
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agree, let's merge
This is the porting of the work done in the incubator project.
It includes the following artifacts, adopted to the latest syntax and checks for S-Core:
Implements: #320
Also-by: @julian711, @aschemmel-tech , @hoe-jo