Skip to content

Conversation

@pahmann
Copy link
Member

@pahmann pahmann commented Dec 16, 2025

Further refinement for audit Deviation_13 and Action_43 which was covered already by earlier commits.

Action taken:

  • The methods table is reworked in accordance to the mapping of the specified test levels to the ISO 26262 test levels.
  • The mapping of the test levels to the ISO 26262-6 test levels is further clarified in the verification plan as part of the PMP

Part of: eclipse-score/process_description#80

Further refinement for audit Deviation_13 and Action_43.

Part of: eclipse-score/process_description#80

Signed-off-by: Philipp Ahmann <Philipp.Ahmann@de.bosch.com>
@github-actions
Copy link

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

@pahmann pahmann requested a review from PandaeDo December 16, 2025 20:33
#. feature requirements

3. Platform testing (on reference hardware)
3. **Testing of the embedded software** as Platform Integration Testing (on reference hardware)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Check, eclipse-score/process_description#464, embedded SW is tailored out std_wp__iso26262__software_1052, update of PMP pending (we deliver source code, not an embedded software), would rephrase it to Software integration verification platform level to verify the integration of features .....,

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Compare here, #2352
See also current statement in Safety Plan
Note that S-CORE will implement Platform Integration Test of stakeholder requirements for demonstration,
but these are not intended to be completely covering the stakeholder requirements.
There will be SW integration tests of feature requirements, as required by ISO 26262 part 6-10.
These may be reused by the users on their HW platform to cover Technical Safety Requirements towards the SW platform.
But if these are sufficiently also covering the TSRs must be analyzed and decided by the user.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider also here: https://github.com/eclipse-score/process_description/pull/464/changes#r2623000202
Still missing some Standard Requirements, some are only relevant for embedded SW, which is not in scope, what is for the others?


**Note:** These three levels translate to the levels of ISO 26262 part 6 clauses 9 to 11. The platform
testing will be executed by the integrator. S-CORE project only executes tests on reference hardware.
**Note:** These three levels from 1 to 3 translate to the levels of ISO 26262 part 6 clauses 9 (unit) to 11 (embedded software).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See above, embedded SW is not in our scope.

#. feature requirements

3. Platform testing (on reference hardware)
3. **Testing of the embedded software** as Platform Integration Testing (on reference hardware)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider also here: https://github.com/eclipse-score/process_description/pull/464/changes#r2623000202
Still missing some Standard Requirements, some are only relevant for embedded SW, which is not in scope, what is for the others?

Copy link
Contributor

@PandaeDo PandaeDo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No additional findings from my side. But I agree on those from Markus

Signed-off-by: Philipp Ahmann <philipp.ahmann@de.bosch.com>
@pahmann pahmann force-pushed the pahmann/verification-level-alignment branch from 0bcbba1 to 69d3f79 Compare December 19, 2025 09:32
@pahmann pahmann requested review from PandaeDo and masc2023 December 19, 2025 09:33
@pahmann pahmann merged commit bb75bb5 into main Dec 19, 2025
8 checks passed
@pahmann pahmann deleted the pahmann/verification-level-alignment branch December 19, 2025 14:40
anmittag pushed a commit to etas-contrib/score_score that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2026
Signed-off-by: Philipp Ahmann <philipp.ahmann@de.bosch.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants