Skip to content

Conversation

@kroehnd
Copy link
Contributor

@kroehnd kroehnd commented Nov 19, 2025

Changes made to address the issues in the ticket

@github-actions
Copy link

⚠️ Docs-as-Code version mismatch detected
Please check the CI build logs for details and align the documentation version with the Bazel dependency.

Copy link
Contributor

@aschemmel-tech aschemmel-tech left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please correct your Commit message (this is how we automatically link to issues):
"
Safety management update

Resolves: #1304
"
Also your documentation does not build, please also solve this failing check.

@github-actions
Copy link

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

@kroehnd kroehnd force-pushed the kroehnd_safety_management_update branch from 8939626 to 3aaca95 Compare November 26, 2025 07:22
* Integration of cybersecurity considerations into safety analyses, including hazard and risk assessments, to ensure that cyber risks are systematically evaluated.
* Alignment of safety and cybersecurity requirements in the development lifecycle, with traceability between safety goals and relevant cybersecurity controls.
* Participation in cross-functional reviews and audits to ensure that both safety and cybersecurity requirements are met and that any conflicts are resolved.
* Continuous monitoring of emerging cybersecurity threats and updating safety plans and processes accordingly.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have a own security plans, so why to update safety plan here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Adjusted wording

aschemmel-tech
aschemmel-tech previously approved these changes Nov 28, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@aschemmel-tech aschemmel-tech left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok now

@masc2023
Copy link
Contributor

@kroehnd , can you solve the conflicts?

@aschemmel-tech aschemmel-tech changed the title Safety management update https://github.com/eclipse-score/score/issues/1304 Safety management update Nov 28, 2025
masc2023
masc2023 previously approved these changes Nov 28, 2025
@aschemmel-tech aschemmel-tech changed the title Safety management update Safety management update - PMP Nov 28, 2025
Signed-off-by: Frank Scholter Peres(MBTI) <145544737+FScholPer@users.noreply.github.com>
@FScholPer FScholPer dismissed stale reviews from masc2023 and aschemmel-tech via ef33790 November 28, 2025 09:34
Copy link
Contributor

@aschemmel-tech aschemmel-tech left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok still

@aschemmel-tech aschemmel-tech merged commit a1451f2 into eclipse-score:main Nov 28, 2025
6 checks passed
ZoranCutura pushed a commit to etas-contrib/score_score that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2025
* Safety Management update

Resolves: eclipse-score#1143

* Safety Management update

Resolves: eclipse-score#1304

* Fixed build issue

* Addressed review feedback

* Fixed review findings

---------

Signed-off-by: Frank Scholter Peres(MBTI) <145544737+FScholPer@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Frank Scholter Peres(MBTI) <145544737+FScholPer@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants