-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
Improvement safety linkage and checklist improvement #438
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improvement safety linkage and checklist improvement #438
Conversation
|
The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html |
...der_templates/modules/module_name/component_name/docs/requirements/chklst_req_inspection.rst
Show resolved
Hide resolved
process/folder_templates/features/feature_name/requirements/chklst_req_inspection.rst
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| - | ||
| - | ||
| * - ARC_04_01 | ||
| - If software partitioning (different operting system processes) is used to implement freedom from interference between the processes with different rating (QM/ASIL), is effectiveness evidence generated during integration and verification tests? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
typo operting, and should that not formulated as question?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
typo fixed. It is formulated as question. The first part is only, in which case the question is relevant.
| Note: see ISO 26262-6, 7.4.9 and Annex D for partitioning | ||
| - manual | ||
| - | ||
| a) shared resources (cpu time, shared memory, ...) are used so that freedom from interference between the processes is ensured, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shared resources alone does not guarantee, the must support FFI, please reformulate the question
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.
…rovement Signed-off-by: RolandJentschETAS <135332348+RolandJentschETAS@users.noreply.github.com>
Add missing links to ISO26262 and add architecture checklist points
Open point from #67