Skip to content

Conversation

@nicu1989
Copy link
Member

Enables optional_links warnings as info.

Related: #178

Enables optional_links warnings as info.

Signed-off-by: Nicolae Dicu <nicolae.dicu.ext@qorix.ai>
@masc2023
Copy link
Contributor

Discussed this already with @AlexanderLanin , your example is great, because this change is not aligned and no wanted from process team, we agreed to decide, what is to be changed in meta model and what in process

does not follow regex:
^std_(wp__iso26262|wp__isosae21434|wp__isopas8926|iic_aspice_40)__.*$

-> Not alinged, will not change now

Copy link
Contributor

@masc2023 masc2023 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See comment

@github-actions
Copy link

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

Signed-off-by: Nicolae Dicu <nicolae.dicu.ext@qorix.ai>
@nicu1989
Copy link
Member Author

Discussed this already with @AlexanderLanin , your example is great, because this change is not aligned and no wanted from process team, we agreed to decide, what is to be changed in meta model and what in process

does not follow regex: ^std_(wp__iso26262|wp__isosae21434|wp__isopas8926|iic_aspice_40)__.*$

-> Not alinged, will not change now

Cool, so then lets leave things unchanged until it is decided what`s to be changed in metamodel and what to be changed in process, right?

@masc2023
Copy link
Contributor

Discussed this already with @AlexanderLanin , your example is great, because this change is not aligned and no wanted from process team, we agreed to decide, what is to be changed in meta model and what in process
does not follow regex: ^std_(wp__iso26262|wp__isosae21434|wp__isopas8926|iic_aspice_40)__.*$
-> Not alinged, will not change now

Cool, so then lets leave things unchanged until it is decided what`s to be changed in metamodel and what to be changed in process, right?

yes, that's why this topic is already on the agenda for next meeting, you are now also invited, that's why the latest release did not upgrade to latest version
https://github.com/orgs/eclipse-score/discussions/407

@nicu1989 nicu1989 marked this pull request as draft September 29, 2025 07:10
@masc2023
Copy link
Contributor

masc2023 commented Sep 30, 2025

Will get a new version with updated metamodel, thus close this PR here
Will be followed-up here, when the new version of Doc-as-code is available
#184

@masc2023 masc2023 closed this Sep 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants