Skip to content

Conversation

@FScholPer
Copy link
Contributor

Frank Scholter Peres frank.scholter_peres@mercedes-benz.com, Mercedes-Benz Tech Innovation GmbH
Provider Information

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 3, 2025

License Check Results

🚀 The license check job ran with the Bazel command:

bazel run //tools:license-check

Status: ⚠️ Needs Review

Click to expand output
[License Check Output]
Extracting Bazel installation...
Starting local Bazel server and connecting to it...
INFO: Invocation ID: fdbb6ff6-0e62-4810-8656-50e1a42d29d2
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Loading: 
Loading: 0 packages loaded
Loading: 0 packages loaded
    currently loading: tools
Loading: 0 packages loaded
    currently loading: tools
Analyzing: target //tools:license-check (1 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)
Analyzing: target //tools:license-check (1 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //tools:license-check (94 packages loaded, 10 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //tools:license-check (136 packages loaded, 838 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //tools:license-check (147 packages loaded, 1706 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //tools:license-check (153 packages loaded, 2559 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //tools:license-check (153 packages loaded, 2559 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //tools:license-check (157 packages loaded, 4705 targets configured)

INFO: Analyzed target //tools:license-check (158 packages loaded, 4831 targets configured).
INFO: Found 1 target...
Target //tools:license.check.license_check up-to-date:
  bazel-bin/tools/license.check.license_check
  bazel-bin/tools/license.check.license_check.jar
INFO: Elapsed time: 17.329s, Critical Path: 0.41s
INFO: 13 processes: 4 disk cache hit, 9 internal.
INFO: Build completed successfully, 13 total actions
INFO: Running command line: bazel-bin/tools/license.check.license_check tools/formatted.txt -review -project automotive.score -repo https://github.com/eclipse-score/bazel_registry -token
usage: org.eclipse.dash.licenses.cli.Main [-batch <int>] [-cd <url>]
       [-confidence <int>] [-ef <url>] [-excludeSources <sources>] [-help] [-lic
       <url>] [-project <shortname>] [-repo <url>] [-review] [-summary <file>]
       [-timeout <seconds>] [-token <token>]

@AlexanderLanin
Copy link
Member

Note that such PRs are generated automatically. It's not a handcrafted PR that can follow a template.

Copy link
Member

@AlexanderLanin AlexanderLanin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Different approach needed to have such a questionnaire. No ideas yet :(

@FScholPer
Copy link
Contributor Author

I know eclipse-score/score#1925. Then we need another solution.I will check what the release action supports

@antonkri
Copy link
Contributor

antonkri commented Nov 5, 2025

@AlexanderLanin Are you sure PR here are created automatically? I though, at least now we create them manually

@AlexanderLanin
Copy link
Member

Correction: for some modules we do manual pull requests

@AlexanderLanin AlexanderLanin merged commit 37e9e1a into main Nov 5, 2025
5 checks passed
@AlexanderLanin AlexanderLanin deleted the pr-template-modules branch November 5, 2025 11:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants