-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 168
Configure SWT build scripts for 4.37 #2193
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@HannesWell , Please review. Created a PR in the absence of @deepika-u by referring to issue #1873 |
https://ci.eclipse.org/releng/computer/riscv%2Dbuild1/ fails to launch and this would prevent pushing rebuild natives. Please open a helpdesk ticket to resolve that before pushing. |
https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/issues/6217 |
Now it is pushed. |
See eclipse-platform/eclipse.platform.releng.aggregator#3070 (comment) Do we miss some native job execution to get SWT binaries built properly? |
Version bump is failing https://github.com/eclipse-platform/eclipse.platform.swt/actions/runs/15440734481/job/43457696095 and has to be fixed. |
|
Stupid questions:
|
|
Should we manually bump versions if GH can't do that for whatever reason?
I didn't get it, sorry. I see number of actions not obviously connected to anything pointing to a PR. |
No, we should give some time for people to look into why the automation fails and get it fixed.
|
Such push errors can also occur if there are LFS changes to be pushed, as that's not possible for maintainers even if edits are allowed for a PR. That's something you experience especially in SWT when adapting a PR of someone else and rebasing on top of master when there has been a natives build in between, as you cannot push the changed LFS artifacts then. You first have to rebase the PR via GitHub and then apply your changes. |
I'm currently looking into it (also with my own PR). |
I was now able to reproduce this in I'm not yet sure if the permissions of the bot-token have somehow been reduced or if this is because of the special nature of the SWT repo as Heiko indicated. |
#2192