Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JITServer support extended to Linux on Power and Linux on Z systems #660

Closed
SueChaplain opened this issue Oct 19, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #661
Closed

JITServer support extended to Linux on Power and Linux on Z systems #660

SueChaplain opened this issue Oct 19, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #661

Comments

@SueChaplain
Copy link
Contributor

Issue or pull request number:
eclipse-openj9/openj9#6914

Overview:
JITServer decouples the JIT compiler from the OpenJ9 VM, freeing up CPU and memory for an application. JITServer then runs in its own process, either locally or on a remote machine, where resources can be separately managed.

Release target:
Eclipse OpenJ9 0.23.0

Applies to the following JDK versions:
8 and 11

Applies to the following platforms:
With this change, Linux X86-64, P, and Z

SueChaplain added a commit to SueChaplain/openj9-docs that referenced this issue Oct 19, 2020
- extended to 64-bit P & Z systems
- update to release topic and JITServer topic

Closes: eclipse-openj9#660

Signed-off-by: Sue Chaplain <sue_chaplain@uk.ibm.com>
SueChaplain added a commit to SueChaplain/openj9-docs that referenced this issue Oct 19, 2020
- extended to 64-bit P & Z systems
- update to release topic and JITServer topic

Closes: eclipse-openj9#660

Signed-off-by: Sue Chaplain <sue_chaplain@uk.ibm.com>
SueChaplain added a commit to SueChaplain/openj9-docs that referenced this issue Oct 19, 2020
- extended to 64-bit P & Z systems
- update to release topic and JITServer topic

Closes: eclipse-openj9#660

Signed-off-by: Sue Chaplain <sue_chaplain@uk.ibm.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant