Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
iox-#1614 Move uninitialized array #1774
iox-#1614 Move uninitialized array #1774
Changes from 5 commits
edd3f99
c6e8967
e988034
c31b000
200616c
bc37c9b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Adding any other fields to the struct will break things. Maybe worth a comment.
I am also wondering whether the zero-initialization braces
{ }
are required here (instead of array ofelement_t
).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we move the braces to
element_t
, they should not be required here. I am generally not sure how it works with padding without trying it out.There can be trailing padding in
element_t
(to make size a multiple of alignment). Depends on our requirements of the padding initialization. Padding initialization which would not happen if we move it I think, but would it as it is now?@elBoberido FYI
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since the
UninitialiizedArray
is typed andelement_t
uses the size and alignment of that type, there are no issues with additional padding bytesThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should not be necessary to use our own struct. Do we want to remove the dependency on
std::aligned_storage
or is there another reason?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I replaced
std::aligned_storage
since it is deprecated in C++23 (I know, not a problem now but maybe later) and already added similar constructs invariant
andUninitializedArray
.