-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 144
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Docker image for glassfish to replace oracle/glassfish #22598
Comments
GlassFish 5.0 can work with JDK 1.8.0.151<=GlassFish_Java_Version<= 1.8.0.141. The reason behind that is https://github.com/javaee/glassfish/issues/22407. Though the issue is fixed in the upstream repository(Glassfish 5.0.1), but it's not backported to GlassFish 5.0(and there is no plan of backporting either) |
Sorry to bother (I know you guys are really busy with 5.1) and hoping this thread is ok for my question: any ETA for the release of 5.0.1? Willing to build a Dockerfile and create a PR... |
Congrats on the first release! I see that 5.1 is out! https://github.com/javaee/glassfish/issues/22407 is a 404 so it's somewhat difficult to follow this issue. For anyone interested in official Eclipse GlassFish Docker images, is this the right issue to track? |
You can follow this Eclipse GlassFish issue:
#22598 (I just searched
for 22407, in the GitHub search)
…On 1/30/2019 7:51 AM, Philip Durbin wrote:
Congrats on the first release! I see that 5.1 is out!
https://github.com/javaee/glassfish/issues/22407 is a 404 so it's
somewhat difficult to follow this issue.
For anyone interested in official Eclipse GlassFish Docker images, is
this the right issue to track?
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#22598 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALtmbiGnK59AxJzOKX76VU9l2h7Yx_-uks5vIb9mgaJpZM4XbwX4>.
|
This issue has been marked as inactive and old and will be closed in 7 days if there is no further activity. If you want the issue to remain open please add a comment |
I am interested in having an official public GlassFish docker image exist. |
This issue has been marked as inactive and old and will be closed in 7 days if there is no further activity. If you want the issue to remain open please add a comment |
Two years since I last asked for this. I still wish an official public GlassFish docker image to exist. A quick summary, the official image is marked deprecated, abandoned by the maintainer, and threatened to be removed from DockerHub. It also is GlassFish 4.1 / JDK 8: https://hub.docker.com/_/glassfish It recommends moving to There also exists a non-official glasshfish image with a few hundred pulls. But having a canonical, official image would be preferred. |
Quick question, because I always used docker images prepared, tuned and customized for the concrete use case: what is your use case? There is quite lot issues related to that:
About the https://hub.docker.com/_/glassfish repo - I even don't know who was the maintainer, so we could adopt it. Years before somebody simply created it. |
I'm not sure that having a use case is relevant. I would agree that having a tuned docker image is better for production use. But the absence of an official image is a perception problem; so is letting the official image languish with warnings of deprecation and links to images that don't exist. It's the same sort of smell as a project not having a release in a while, or a library that fails to publish to Maven Central. Having a 'blessed' official image is its own reward, it adds credibility that the image is not malicious. Right now the only thing that comes close is IBM's ppc image: https://hub.docker.com/search?q=glassfish&source=community&image_filter=store My use case for using any official JDK image is of the same sort: it may not be ideal for production, but I have assurance that it's not malicious, lots of other people are using it, and it was likely built by someone that knew what they were doing. As far as what JDK should it be based on and other tuning issues, the same guidelines as other official images would apply. Build on top of other official DockerHub images, pick sensible defaults for the main image and provide tags for alternative builds, e.g. different JDK versions and providers.
Nominating a new image to become the DockerHub official |
Ok, you convinced me, we will do something with that ... soon! :-) |
I'm convinced too. Let's set this too a high priority. |
Might want to keep this open until there's a new image on DockerHub. |
You're right! |
This issue has been marked as inactive and old and will be closed in 7 days if there is no further activity. If you want the issue to remain open please add a comment |
Almost a year ago that docker-library/official-images#14107 was created. Are we going to celebrate its anniversary? |
We will do in March, I hope ;-) |
Ok, after all I believe we can close this - DockerHub still fails to review and merge my PR, but after OmniFish donated its work to the Eclipse Foundation I was able to deploy Eclipse GlassFish 7.0.16 multiplatform image. We also added some documentation how to use it. |
"Docker image for glassfish"
Environment Details
Problem Description
Since GlassFish Docker image
oracle/glassfish
has been removed from the Oracle docker-images repository as part of the donation process to the Eclipse Foundation, I can't continue to build my docker image from oracle/glassfish:5.0-web.Are you going to create a new official image to replace
oracle/glassfish
? I can't find any official images for glassfish 5 today on docker hub ...Steps to reproduce
Dockerfile :
Impact of Issue
I can't continue to build my docker image to deliver on docker hub my new version of my open-source project
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: