forked from gcc-mirror/gcc
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
With stacktrace attribute #6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
ecatmur
wants to merge
6
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
with-stacktrace-attribute
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Rather than allocate heap space (next to the exception object?), we use a thread_local with_stacktrace object and move-construct the catch object immediately on entry into the catch block. Builds on recent std::stacktrace support, added in https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-January/588617.html Pass --enable-libstdcxx-backtrace=yes to configure and link libstdc++_libbacktrace.a We pass the caught type through the exception machinery in a special WITH_STACKTRACE_TYPE type wrapper. This is mangled as if it was an attribute (we can't use an actual attribute-modified type, because (a) attributes can't variably modify tagged types, and (b) only platform attributes are allowed to affect type identity). The function to perform the work of collecting the stacktrace at throw point is not compiled into libsupc++ but instead grabbed out of namespace std when doing rtti for the catch block. This is more flexible and in keeping with zero-overhead principle.
per P2370
ecatmur
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 17, 2022
This simple patch implements Richard Biener's suggestion in comment #6 of PR tree-optimization/52171 (from February 2013) that the insn-preds code generated by genpreds can avoid using strncmp when matching constant strings of length one. The effect of this patch is best explained by the diff of insn-preds.cc: < if (!strncmp (str + 1, "g", 1)) --- > if (str[1] == 'g') 3104c3104 < if (!strncmp (str + 1, "m", 1)) --- > if (str[1] == 'm') 3106c3106 < if (!strncmp (str + 1, "c", 1)) --- > if (str[1] == 'c') ... The equivalent optimization is performed by GCC (but perhaps not by the host compiler), but generating simpler/smaller code may encourage further optimizations (such as use of a switch statement). 2022-05-24 Roger Sayle <roger@nextmovesoftware.com> gcc/ChangeLog * genpreds.cc (write_lookup_constraint_1): Avoid generating a call to strncmp for strings of length one.
ecatmur
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 17, 2022
This patch fixes both ICE regressions PR middle-end/105853 and
PR target/105856 caused by my recent patch to expand small const structs
as immediate constants. That patch updated code generation in three
places: two in expr.cc that call store_constructor directly, and the
third in calls.cc's load_register_parameters that expands its CONSTRUCTOR
via expand_expr, as store_constructor is local/static to expr.cc, and
the "public" API, should usually simply forward the constructor to the
appropriate store_constructor function.
Alas, despite the clean regression testing on multiple targets, the above
ICEs show that expand_expr isn't a suitable proxy for store_constructor,
and things that (I'd assumed) shouldn't affect how/whether a struct is
placed in a register [such as whether the struct is considered packed/
aligned or not] actually interfere with the optimization that is being
attempted.
The (proposed) solution is to export store_constructor (and it's helper
function int_expr_size) from expr.cc, by removing their static qualifier
and prototyping both functions in expr.h, so they can be called directly
from load_register_parameters in calls.cc. This cures both ICEs, but
almost as importantly improves code generation over GCC 12.
For PR 105853, GCC 12 generates:
compose_nd_na_ipv6_src:
movzx eax, WORD PTR eth_addr_zero[rip+2]
movzx edx, WORD PTR eth_addr_zero[rip]
movzx edi, WORD PTR eth_addr_zero[rip+4]
sal rax, 16
or rax, rdx
sal rdi, 32
or rdi, rax
xor eax, eax
jmp packet_set_nd
eth_addr_zero: .zero 6
where now (with this fix) GCC 13 generates:
compose_nd_na_ipv6_src:
xorl %edi, %edi
xorl %eax, %eax
jmp packet_set_nd
Likewise, for PR 105856 on ARM, we'd previously generate:
g_329_3:
movw r3, #:lower16:.LANCHOR0
movt r3, #:upper16:.LANCHOR0
ldr r0, [r3]
b func_19
but with this optimization we now generate:
g_329_3:
mov r0, #6
b func_19
2022-06-07 Roger Sayle <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>
gcc/ChangeLog
PR middle-end/105853
PR target/105856
* calls.cc (load_register_parameters): Call store_constructor
and int_expr_size directly instead of expanding via expand_expr.
* expr.cc (static void store_constructor): Don't prototype here.
(static HOST_WIDE_INT int_expr_size): Likewise.
(store_constructor): No longer static.
(int_expr_size): Likewise, no longer static.
* expr.h (store_constructor): Prototype here.
(int_expr_size): Prototype here.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
PR middle-end/105853
PR target/105856
* gcc.dg/pr105853.c: New test case.
* gcc.dg/pr105856.c: New test case.
ecatmur
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 17, 2022
This patch addresses the issue in comment #6 of PR rtl-optimization/7061 (a four digit PR number) from 2006 where on x86_64 complex number arguments are unconditionally spilled to the stack. For the test cases below: float re(float _Complex a) { return __real__ a; } float im(float _Complex a) { return __imag__ a; } GCC with -O2 currently generates: re: movq %xmm0, -8(%rsp) movss -8(%rsp), %xmm0 ret im: movq %xmm0, -8(%rsp) movss -4(%rsp), %xmm0 ret with this patch we now generate: re: ret im: movq %xmm0, %rax shrq $32, %rax movd %eax, %xmm0 ret [Technically, this shift can be performed on %xmm0 in a single instruction, but the backend needs to be taught to do that, the important bit is that the SCmode argument isn't written to the stack]. The patch itself is to emit_group_store where just before RTL expansion commits to writing to the stack, we check if the store group consists of a single scalar integer register that holds a complex mode value; on x86_64 SCmode arguments are passed in DImode registers. If this is the case, we can use a SUBREG to "view_convert" the integer to the equivalent complex mode. An interesting corner case that showed up during testing is that x86_64 also passes HCmode arguments in DImode registers(!), i.e. using modes of different sizes. This is easily handled/supported by first converting to an integer mode of the correct size, and then generating a complex mode SUBREG of this. This is similar in concept to the patch I proposed here: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-February/590139.html 2020-06-10 Roger Sayle <roger@nextmovesoftware.com> gcc/ChangeLog PR rtl-optimization/7061 * expr.cc (emit_group_store): For groups that consist of a single scalar integer register that hold a complex mode value, use gen_lowpart to generate a SUBREG to "view_convert" to the complex mode. For modes of different sizes, first convert to an integer mode of the appropriate size. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog PR rtl-optimization/7061 * gcc.target/i386/pr7061-1.c: New test case. * gcc.target/i386/pr7061-2.c: New test case.
ecatmur
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2023
I noticed that for member class templates of a class template we were
unnecessarily substituting both the template and its type. Avoiding that
duplication speeds compilation of this silly testcase from ~12s to ~9s on my
laptop. It's unlikely to make a difference on any real code, but the
simplification is also nice.
We still need to clear CLASSTYPE_USE_TEMPLATE on the partial instantiation
of the template class, but it makes more sense to do that in
tsubst_template_decl anyway.
#define NC(X) \
template <class U> struct X##1; \
template <class U> struct X##2; \
template <class U> struct X##3; \
template <class U> struct X##4; \
template <class U> struct X##5; \
template <class U> struct X##6;
#define NC2(X) NC(X##a) NC(X##b) NC(X##c) NC(X##d) NC(X##e) NC(X##f)
#define NC3(X) NC2(X##A) NC2(X##B) NC2(X##C) NC2(X##D) NC2(X##E)
template <int I> struct A
{
NC3(am)
};
template <class...Ts> void sink(Ts...);
template <int...Is> void g()
{
sink(A<Is>()...);
}
template <int I> void f()
{
g<__integer_pack(I)...>();
}
int main()
{
f<1000>();
}
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* pt.cc (instantiate_class_template): Skip the RECORD_TYPE
of a class template.
(tsubst_template_decl): Clear CLASSTYPE_USE_TEMPLATE.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.