Skip to content

Conversation

@officialmofabs
Copy link

@officialmofabs officialmofabs commented May 18, 2025

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the maven dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • samples/client/echo_api/java/restclient/pom.xml

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score Upgrade
low severity Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity
SNYK-JAVA-ORGSPRINGFRAMEWORK-10176071
  401   org.springframework:spring-context:
6.1.6 -> 6.1.20
No Known Exploit

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

Summary by Sourcery

Bug Fixes:

  • Upgrade org.springframework:spring-context from 6.1.6 to 6.1.20 to address an improper case sensitivity handling vulnerability

@sourcery-ai
Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented May 18, 2025

Reviewer's Guide

The PR updates the Spring framework version in the Maven POM to address a case-sensitivity vulnerability by bumping the spring-web-version property from 6.1.6 to 6.1.20.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Upgraded Spring dependency version to fix security vulnerability
  • Bumped from 6.1.6 to 6.1.20
samples/client/echo_api/java/restclient/pom.xml

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@socket-security
Copy link

Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

Diff Package Supply Chain
Security
Vulnerability Quality Maintenance License
Updatedmaven/​org.springframework/​spring-context@​6.1.6 ⏵ 6.1.20100 +64100 +289100100 +20
Updatedmaven/​org.springframework/​spring-web@​6.1.6 ⏵ 6.1.20100 +64100 +289100100 +20

View full report

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants