Skip to content

Conversation

@nytamin
Copy link
Collaborator

@nytamin nytamin commented Jun 13, 2025

To be discussed in the Working Group

@nytamin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

nytamin commented Jun 18, 2025

Notes from discussion today:
We should not put too much wording into the behavior of the Graphic, rather tilt it towards what the graphic can expect in terms of the timing of it's actions.

If a Promise is not resolved within a certain amount of time, the caller MAY consider the promise as failed.
...
The Graphic can expect each call to its actions to have waited for its previous action Promise to have resolved.
If a call to an action comes before the Promise has resolved, the graphic is free to handle that as it sees fit.
A controller that doesn't wait for the promises, cannot make any assumptions of the resulting the behavior.

@nytamin nytamin added the Concluded - waiting for implementation This issue has been discussed by the Working Group and a conclusion has been reached. label Oct 1, 2025
@dvdeurse
Copy link
Collaborator

dvdeurse commented Nov 7, 2025

I merged #34, which basically contains the same information (amongst others) as was proposed in this pull request. So I suggest to close this one without merging.

@nytamin nytamin closed this Nov 11, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Concluded - waiting for implementation This issue has been discussed by the Working Group and a conclusion has been reached. ograf-graphics

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants