NamedType increment and decrement bypass range checks #192

tomjnixon · 2024-01-15T13:10:27Z

this test passes, and probably shouldn't:

TEST_CASE("NamedType_increment_check") {
  using namespace adm;
  using NamedIntegerRange = detail::NamedType<int, struct NamedIntegerRangeTag,
                                              detail::RangeValidator<0, 10> >;
  NamedIntegerRange value(0);
  value--;
}

the mess here is to make sure that the new value is valid without changing the old value, to make sure that the value stays valid even when an exception is thrown fixes #192

tomjnixon added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 16, 2024

NamedType: validate in ++ and --

01685d6

the mess here is to make sure that the new value is valid without changing the old value, to make sure that the value stays valid even when an exception is thrown fixes #192

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

NamedType increment and decrement bypass range checks #192

NamedType increment and decrement bypass range checks #192

tomjnixon commented Jan 15, 2024 •

edited

Loading

NamedType increment and decrement bypass range checks #192

NamedType increment and decrement bypass range checks #192

Comments

tomjnixon commented Jan 15, 2024 • edited Loading

tomjnixon commented Jan 15, 2024 •

edited

Loading