Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge pull request #5024 from ebmdatalab/remove_star_pus
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Remove STAR-PUs
  • Loading branch information
richiecroker authored Oct 29, 2024
2 parents 968ac69 + 7cdd0c3 commit 6da9f0e
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 2 additions and 5 deletions.
1 change: 0 additions & 1 deletion openprescribing/templates/analyse.html
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -68,7 +68,6 @@ <h1>Search GP prescribing data</h1>
<option value="nothing" selected>nothing</option>
<option value="chemical">drugs or BNF sections</option>
<option value="total_list_size" selected>total list size</option>
<option value="star_pu.oral_antibacterials_item">STAR-PUs for antibiotics</option>
</select>
</div>
<div class="col right">
Expand Down
6 changes: 2 additions & 4 deletions openprescribing/templates/faq.html
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -212,12 +212,10 @@ <h3 id="denominator">What denominator should I use?</h3>

<p>You can use "list size" which tells you how many patients a practice covers, but this can be problematic, because different practices will have different kinds of patients, some with lots of older people, and so on.</p>

<p>To account for this the NHS uses imperfect but useful "adjusted" denominators called STAR-PUs, which try to account for the age and sex structure of the practice's population. These STAR-PUs are specific to specific disease areas, because they try to account for different rates of usage -- in different age bands of the population - for specific treatment. So for the STAR-PU for cardiovascular disease prevention prescribing, for example, gives you extra points for every man aged 40-50, even more for men aged 50-60, and so on; but less for women in the same bands, and very little for younger people.</p>

<p>Generating these STAR-PUs for each practice, each disease area, and each month, takes coder time, so we currently only have the STAR-PU for antibiotics.</p>

<p>When using the data ourselves we tend to use more thoughtful approaches to try to "bake in" population prevalence or need for a particular condition, or to explore different prescribing patterns. For example, we often use whole classes of drug as the denominator in our analyses, as in the video walkthroughs; or we compare the use of one drug against the use of another. When looking at whether a practice is using a lot of Nexium (an expensive "proton pump inhibitor" pill for treating ulcers) we might look at "Nexium prescribing" versus "all proton pump inhibitor prescribing" (<a href="{% url 'analyse' %}#org=Sub-ICB Location&numIds=0103050E0BB&denomIds=1.3.5">example</a>).</p>

<p>We have removed STAR-PUs as a denominator option on our analysis page and from several of our pre-built antibiotic measures. This decision was made following user consultation, due to concerns about the appropriateness of the STAR-PU weightings, which have not been reviewed since 2013. You can read more about this in our <a href="https://www.bennett.ox.ac.uk/blog/2024/02/star-pus-should-we-still-be-using-them/">blog</a>.</p>

<p>Play around and <a href="mailto:{{ FEEDBACK_MAILTO }}">let us know</a> if you find anything interesting, or develop any interesting methods.</p>

<h2>Dashboards</h2>
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 6da9f0e

Please sign in to comment.