Skip to content

build: Do not use set10() for InitOnce checks#133

Merged
ebassi merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
init-once
Dec 21, 2018
Merged

build: Do not use set10() for InitOnce checks#133
ebassi merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
init-once

Conversation

@ebassi

@ebassi ebassi commented Dec 21, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

We use #ifdef HAVE_INIT_ONCE all over the place, and set10() will
unconditionally define the symbol, which means the check will always
succeed even if InitOnce and friends are not available.

We use `#ifdef HAVE_INIT_ONCE` all over the place, and set10() will
unconditionally define the symbol, which means the check will always
succeed even if InitOnce and friends are not available.
@ebassi ebassi merged commit df2186e into master Dec 21, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant