Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add proper control-info for marginalize = "individual" #360

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jan 20, 2025

Conversation

strengejacke
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@DominiqueMakowski
Copy link
Member

Sorry for that late suggestion, but should we rename "individual" for "specific"? Because it's more that it's about "specific" observations (which in some contexts is indeed one "individual") than individuals 😬

@DominiqueMakowski
Copy link
Member

i.e., even though it's not a user-facing feature, "individual" might be misleading suggesting that it might have to do with marginalizing over participants or random factors or something like that

@strengejacke
Copy link
Member Author

Ok. Luckily, we had timing issues with the submission, so we may include this PR here, too, it also fixes an issue in footer printing for estimate_relation().

@strengejacke
Copy link
Member Author

I noticed this because I'm currently updating my slides for teaching :-) This is probably a good stress test ;-)

@strengejacke strengejacke merged commit 177660e into main Jan 20, 2025
18 of 22 checks passed
@strengejacke strengejacke deleted the footer_individual branch January 20, 2025 15:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants