Skip to content

Work with consultant to improve EQT policies #12

@joereddington

Description

@joereddington

From Comic Relief:

"So yes, as discussed we’ve given you an additional £3,500 to spend on consultancy to support the strengthening of your financial management and processes and your governance."

Background

We want to have effective and up to date finantial management and governance. As a secondary goals we also want to be able to demonstrate to funders and auditors that:

  • We are a safe pair of hands
  • We have all our ducks in a row
  • We are 'sound'

Metaphors asside - we've been marked down by some funders recently on our govenance - Children in Need, Arts Council denied us funding on that basis and Comic Relief presumably don't give this money to people with all their ducks in a row. So it would be extremely good to know what these funders are ideally looking for when they do their due dilligence. That's NOT to say we intend to completely capitulate, but if we know what they want they we can highlight the relevent parts.

What we want the consultant to do.

Three phases:

  • Write a report with recommendations
  • Give us a few months to implement the recommendations
  • Come back, reassess and give us a testimonal we can put on the website that says "I, a proper clever person, think these guys are serious guys"

As a bonus 'getting started' deliverable, we'd like the consultant to give us a model answer to a couple of questions we've had to funders - as discussed above, we can either work to make everything in the model answer true, or we can use is as a starting point.

The report

We expect four sections in the report. The first two are should/musts for our organisation and they should make up the main proportion of the work. Items 3 and 4 are much smaller. We recognise that all sections are somewhat subjective, particularly 3 and 4 and we would be happy to see the consultant 'get into character' for 3 and 4.

  1. We'd like a list of things that the charity should/must be doing at it's current size,
  2. We'd like a list of things that the charity should/must be doing when it reaches, for the sake of the argument, a £250,000 turnover.
  3. We'd also like to consider Thora Masoud. Thora does due dilligence for a large UK funder and will assess us for a £400,000 grant sometime in the next five years. We'd like to know what she needs to see give us a clear bill of health. We might NOT do any of them, but we want to know what they are.
  4. Lastly we'd like to consider Argiñe Trafford. She is serious person in central government and she happens to be browsing our website because she is interested in one of our projects. We'd like to know what should be on our website in terms of finance and govenance to make Argiñe take us seriously.

How are we going to do this?

  • Weekly meetings, where we supply him with any information he requires.
  • Deadline date for report.
  • Share this issue with them, encourage them to use it.

Plan

  • Recruit Consulant
    • get recommendations from Comic Relief
    • get recommendations from MySociety (the organisation we'd like to grow up into)
    • get term of reference from two consultances
    • choose
  • argree milestones and regular meeting time.
  • Get report
  • work on report in seperate issues
  • Get updated checks.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    Status

    A named person needs this, but there isn't a deadline

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions