Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Include Shared Memory in the default transports. <2.0.x> [9726] #1515

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 27, 2020

Conversation

MiguelCompany
Copy link
Member

There have been several improvements and fixes on the Shared Memory transport, like #1329 and #1330, that made it more robust.

This PR adds this transport to the default ones.

Signed-off-by: Miguel Company MiguelCompany@eprosima.com

Signed-off-by: Miguel Company <MiguelCompany@eprosima.com>
@MiguelCompany
Copy link
Member Author

It would be great if someone launches a ROS2 CI against this PR.

@jacobperron perhaps?

@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany changed the title Include Shared Memory in the default transports. Include Shared Memory in the default transports. <2.0.x> Oct 23, 2020
@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany changed the title Include Shared Memory in the default transports. <2.0.x> Include Shared Memory in the default transports. <2.0.x> [9726] Oct 23, 2020
@jacobperron
Copy link
Contributor

Here you go:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Linux-aarch64 Build Status
  • macOS Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@richiware
Copy link
Member

Build status:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Linux aarch64Build Status
  • Mac Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@MiguelCompany
Copy link
Member Author

Here you go:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Linux-aarch64 Build Status
  • macOS Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@jacobperron Thanks for this. Are the failures related to this PR? I see a lot of of them mentioning connext

Copy link
Contributor

@IkerLuengo IkerLuengo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jacobperron
Copy link
Contributor

@MiguelCompany I'm pretty sure the test failures for connext are not related to the PR; Also I suspect the rclcpp.topic_statistics tests are unrelated. I'm not sure about the security tests failures on macOS and the rcl_action test failures on Windows. I'll retrigger CI with Fast-DDS only this time:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Linux-aarch64 Build Status
  • macOS Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany added this to the v2.0.2 milestone Oct 27, 2020
@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany merged commit a657025 into 2.0.x Oct 27, 2020
@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany deleted the feature/enable-default-shm/2.0.x branch October 27, 2020 06:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants