Partner rejection updates

[marcusljf]

• Reduced max characters of the program application rejection to from 5000 to 500
• Updated the tooltip styling to be closer to the designs
• Ensured formatting carries through from note -> tooltip -> email

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Validation Changes

  • Reduced maximum character limit for partner rejection notes from 5000 to 500 characters.

• UI/UX Improvements

  • Added a real-time character counter to the rejection notes field and enforced the shorter limit.
  • Improved rejected-application details layout with tighter spacing, adjusted iconography, and refined typography for clearer hierarchy.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
dub	Ready	Preview	Mar 31, 2026 7:54pm

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Reduces the maximum character limit for partner rejection notes from 5000 to 500 and updates the corresponding UI components. Adds a character counter display in the rejection modal and refreshes tooltip styling and layout in the partner program card.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Schema Configuration apps/web/lib/zod/schemas/partners.ts	Updated PROGRAM_APPLICATION_REJECTION_NOTE_MAX_LENGTH constant from 5000 to 500 characters, tightening the validation constraint for rejection note fields.
Rejection Modal UI apps/web/ui/modals/reject-partner-application-modal.tsx	Added a character counter display next to the "Additional notes (optional)" label showing current length against the configured maximum; textarea still enforces maxLength binding.
Partner Card Tooltip apps/web/ui/partners/program-card.tsx	Refactored rejection tooltip layout with updated spacing (gap-2 p-3 pb-4), row styling (flex w-full items-start gap-2), typography adjustments (label: text-[10px] font-bold; default value: text-xs), icon replacement (CircleInfo → CircleQuestion), and reordered rows with "Reviewed" at top.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes

Poem

I nibbled lines and trimmed the note,
From five thousand down to five-oh-oh — so remote,
A counter now ticks, neat and spry,
Tooltips polished, styled to fly,
Hooray — a rabbit's tidy code hop! 🐇✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title "Partner rejection updates" is vague and generic, using non-specific language that doesn't convey the meaningful details of the changeset (max character limit reduction, tooltip styling, and formatting improvements).	Consider using a more descriptive title such as "Reduce rejection note limit to 500 chars and update tooltip styling" to better communicate the primary changes.

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch rejection-tooltip

Warning

Review ran into problems

🔥 Problems

Timed out fetching pipeline failures after 30000ms

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)

apps/web/ui/partners/program-card.tsx (1)

34-52: ⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

font-reg is not a valid Tailwind utility and will be silently ignored.

The class font-reg used on lines 45 and 93 is not defined in the Tailwind configuration. Standard Tailwind only provides font-thin through font-black. Since this utility doesn't exist, the font-weight styling will be lost. Check if this should be font-normal (400 weight) or if a custom font-reg utility needs to be added to the Tailwind config.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@apps/web/ui/partners/program-card.tsx` around lines 34 - 52, The component
uses a non-existent Tailwind utility "font-reg" (in the value paragraph class)
so the font-weight is silently ignored; update the class on the element that
renders {value} (and any other occurrences of "font-reg" in this file/component)
to a valid utility like "font-normal" or change to a configured custom utility
by adding "font-reg" to the Tailwind config; locate the class string inside the
JSX (the valueClassName fallback and any hardcoded classnames around the {value}
render) and replace "font-reg" with "font-normal" unless you intentionally add
"font-reg" to your Tailwind theme.

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Outside diff comments:
In `@apps/web/ui/partners/program-card.tsx`:
- Around line 34-52: The component uses a non-existent Tailwind utility
"font-reg" (in the value paragraph class) so the font-weight is silently
ignored; update the class on the element that renders {value} (and any other
occurrences of "font-reg" in this file/component) to a valid utility like
"font-normal" or change to a configured custom utility by adding "font-reg" to
the Tailwind config; locate the class string inside the JSX (the valueClassName
fallback and any hardcoded classnames around the {value} render) and replace
"font-reg" with "font-normal" unless you intentionally add "font-reg" to your
Tailwind theme.

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: cb7d9441-9231-43f9-bf08-236e8bc711bc

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4b050e2 and d9cbda9.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• apps/web/lib/zod/schemas/partners.ts
• apps/web/ui/modals/reject-partner-application-modal.tsx
• apps/web/ui/partners/program-card.tsx

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@apps/web/ui/partners/program-card.tsx`:
- Line 93: Replace the typo in the class string used for the ProgramCard
component: change the valueClassName prop value that currently contains
"font-reg" to "font-regular" so it matches the project's established utility
classname pattern (look for valueClassName="... font-reg ..." in
program-card.tsx and update to "font-regular").

🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: f2587232-c4b7-4e3e-828f-25e260e84350

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d9cbda9 and 6b5a0c7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• apps/web/ui/partners/program-card.tsx