Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Releasing v1.0.1 #117

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 4, 2020
Merged

Releasing v1.0.1 #117

merged 3 commits into from
Jun 4, 2020

Conversation

bdestombe
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Merge pull request dtscalibration#116 from bdestombe/master
Signed-off-by: Bas des Tombe <bdestombe@gmail.com>
@bdestombe bdestombe merged commit f8ef813 into dtscalibration:master Jun 4, 2020
Copy link
Collaborator

@BSchilperoort BSchilperoort left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hoi Bas,

There were a few more changes since 1.0. Perhaps it's also good to list them as bugfixes vs new features. I had already made this list of all changes up to your PR.;


New features

  • st_var can now be array-like. The array-like can vary in x or time, or both.
  • When converting from a xr.Dataset to a DataStore object, the attributes are now transfered over
  • Added 'verbose' kwarg to shift_double_ended utility function to silence the console output

Bug fixes

  • If the '_sections' attribute is missing from a DataStore object it is automagically re-added.
  • Assert that stokes variances are passed when running a double-ended WLS calibration
  • Added check for NaN/inf values in wls_sparse solver to avoid unclear error messages
  • Before calibration, the values of the used reference temperatures are checked if they are valid (float dtype, no NaN/inf values, correct time dimension)

@bdestombe
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@BSchilperoort Sorry, missed your comment. Made your suggested changes to the CHANGELOG.rst which will appear in v1.0.2

@BSchilperoort
Copy link
Collaborator

Well I only posted it after you already merged the PR haha.

Perhaps we should make it a habit to change the changelog with every PR? I had this list made for some time, but didn't think of adding it to the changelog already.

@bdestombe
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Yes, but I merged the PR rather quick, giving you no time to post any feedback ;)

Your idea sounds more than reasonable

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants