Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document fat LTO and codegen unit solution #55

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 20, 2024

Conversation

nickbabcock
Copy link
Contributor

Occasionally thin LTO isn't enough, and one needs to leverage fat LTO and a single codegen unit in order for no_panic to succeed. See PR where both are needed.

Closes #54

Occassionally thin LTO isn't enough, and one needs to leverage fat LTO
and a single codegen unit in order for no_panic to succeed. [See PR][0]
where both are needed.

[0]: nickbabcock/highway-rs#78
Copy link
Owner

@dtolnay dtolnay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@dtolnay dtolnay merged commit a9f6b34 into dtolnay:master Jan 20, 2024
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

False positive with hashing
2 participants