Skip to content

Conversation

@problame
Copy link

fixes #77

Sponsored-by: 49nord GmbH

@problame
Copy link
Author

What is the maintainers' opinion on this PR?

Despite of the discussions in #77, I believe that it would be the most pragmatic approach to merge the feature implemented by this PR until the larger Rust community converges to how we should deal with Sync futures across libraries.

@Dzordzu
Copy link

Dzordzu commented Sep 21, 2022

Hi. Is there any option to merge it?

Copy link
Owner

@dtolnay dtolnay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like the branch that this PR was created from has commits that were not intended to be included in this PR, so this is not in a mergeable state.

I see there is another Sync-related PR open (#216) so I'll close this one in favor of that. Thanks anyway!

@dtolnay dtolnay closed this Dec 1, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Future type returned by trait methods should impl Sync

4 participants