Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: API 56, new methods #27

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 7, 2023
Merged

feat: API 56, new methods #27

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 7, 2023

Conversation

dschach
Copy link
Owner

@dschach dschach commented Feb 7, 2023

This updates API to 56 and replaces test assertions with the new Assert class

feat: Add available record type maps
Return only RTs available to running user

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 7, 2023

Codecov Report

Base: 100.00% // Head: 98.48% // Decreases project coverage by -1.52% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (5f718ab) compared to base (4ad4046).
Patch coverage: 90.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

❗ Current head 5f718ab differs from pull request most recent head a3bdbc3. Consider uploading reports for the commit a3bdbc3 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##              main      #27      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   100.00%   98.48%   -1.52%     
===========================================
  Files            1        1              
  Lines          112      132      +20     
===========================================
+ Hits           112      130      +18     
- Misses           0        2       +2     
Flag Coverage Δ
Apex 98.48% <90.00%> (-1.52%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
force-app/main/default/classes/RecordTypes.cls 98.48% <90.00%> (-1.52%) ⬇️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant