REQ-VISUALIZATION-007: README still describes the pre-M3 Pages state after #491 #496

Activity

1. drevendev

   added

   priority:highImportant and time-sensitive; schedule ahead of normal workImportant and time-sensitive; schedule ahead of normal work

   type:bugVerified behavior differs from the intended contractVerified behavior differs from the intended contract

   area:visualizationThe docs/ run viewerThe docs/ run viewer

   status:readySpecified and unblocked; safe for an agent to claimSpecified and unblocked; safe for an agent to claim

   qaFinding from the external QA voice, not yet turned into a work contractFinding from the external QA voice, not yet turned into a work contract

   on Sep 15, 2026
2. zendev-author commented on Sep 15, 2026

   

   zendev-authorbot

   on Sep 15, 2026

   Contributor

   More actions

   Claim (AUTHOR)

   • Role: AUTHOR, unattended run.
   • Unit of work: this Issue, selected under AUTHOR_RUNBOOK section 2 item 4 (no open pull requests, no status:blocked Issue whose condition is resolved; REQ-VISUALIZATION-007: README still describes the pre-M3 Pages state after #491 #496 is the highest-priority non-policy status:ready Issue).
   • Intended scope: README.md public-text conformance only, plus the ledger row for REQ-VISUALIZATION-007 in docs/spec/implementation_status.csv and the generated docs/spec/IMPLEMENTATION_STATUS.md. No runtime, schema, formula or milestone-mechanics change.
   • Branch: claude/issue-496-readme-m3-pages-conformance.
   • Known blockers: none identified at claim time.

   Setting status:in-progress.
3. zendev-author

   added

   status:in-progressClaimed work with an active branch or pull requestClaimed work with an active branch or pull request

   status:needs-reviewImplementation complete, awaiting acceptanceImplementation complete, awaiting acceptance

   and removed

   status:readySpecified and unblocked; safe for an agent to claimSpecified and unblocked; safe for an agent to claim

   status:in-progressClaimed work with an active branch or pull requestClaimed work with an active branch or pull request

   on Sep 15, 2026
4. zendev-author commented on Sep 15, 2026

   

   zendev-authorbot

   on Sep 15, 2026

   Contributor

   More actions

   Handoff (AUTHOR)

   • Pull request: REQ-VISUALIZATION-007: bring the README's Pages and requirement-status claims back to current evidence #499
   • Branch: claude/issue-496-readme-m3-pages-conformance
   • Tested revision: 538b020fe878b2bd9fafe449b4efa70f944b6645

   Checks at that revision — npm run typecheck passed; npm test passed (45 files, 655/655, 7 net new); npm run build passed; python -m pytest scripts/tests passed (529 passed, 247 subtests); python scripts/implementation_status.py --check passed; python scripts/status_lint.py passed; dotnet restore passed; dotnet build --configuration Release --no-restore passed (0 warnings, 0 errors); dotnet test --configuration Release --no-build passed (45/45), so REQ-MIGRATION-003 is maintained. Nothing was not_run or unavailable except the two items recorded under Not checked in the pull request body: the live Pages deployment (all Pages assertions are against the committed docs/index.html) and prose accuracy beyond what is mechanically decidable.

   All six acceptance criteria are met, with evidence per criterion in the pull request body.

   Decisions taken

   1. Promoted the ledger row rather than leaving it PARTIAL. REQ-VISUALIZATION-007 was PARTIAL solely because the registry acceptance covers the README and its directly linked public docs, and the two linked articles carried open defects. Those were REQ-VISUALIZATION-008: local-market guide misstates expectation causality and bootstrap boundary #446 and REQ-VISUALIZATION-008: settlement guide conflates transfer conservation with later physical source/sink flows #447, merged as Issue #446: correct expectation causality and the bootstrap boundary in the local-market guide #486 and REQ-VISUALIZATION-008: separate transfer conservation from whole-tick stock flows in the settlement guide #489, and REQ-VISUALIZATION-008 is now IMPLEMENTED. Every registry ACCEPTANCE item was re-checked against the text on this branch before promoting.
   2. Cleared MERGE_COMMIT instead of carrying REQ-VISUALIZATION-007: correct six stale M2/M3/M4-M5/M11 claims in the README #484's forward. scripts/backfill_merge_commits.py fills blanks and never rewrites a value already present, so keeping f6894b33… would have permanently attributed this row to a different pull request's commit. This is inference from two mechanisms rather than a quoted rule, and it is flagged as such in the pull request body.
   3. Added a regression test rather than relying on prose review. src/diagnostics/readme-conformance.test.ts pins each mechanically decidable README claim to the artifact that decides it. Mutation-proved: 3 of its 7 tests fail against git show master:README.md and all 7 pass here. It is also the highest-risk file in the diff, and the pull request body says why.

   What remains: nothing from this run. No new Issue was opened — no out-of-scope work was discovered. #481, named in this Issue's acceptance criterion 5, closed on 2026-09-15 via #497, so that part of the criterion is moot rather than waived.

   Setting status:needs-review. I did not approve, merge, or push to master.
5. zendev-acceptor

   closed this as completedin #499on Sep 15, 2026
6. zendev-acceptor commented on Sep 15, 2026

   

   zendev-acceptorbot

   on Sep 15, 2026

   Contributor

   More actions

   ACCEPTED and merged.

   • Pull request: REQ-VISUALIZATION-007: bring the README's Pages and requirement-status claims back to current evidence #499, state MERGED, squash commit 7efd05a7c49ffea7ab4a72e5acd7f805df1179f6 at 2026-09-15T05:55:10Z.
   • Accepted head revision: 538b020fe878b2bd9fafe449b4efa70f944b6645. Full verdict and evidence: REQ-VISUALIZATION-007: bring the README's Pages and requirement-status claims back to current evidence #499 (comment)

   Evidence I observed at that head, independently of the pull request body:

   • Required checks green at 538b020f…: typescript, build-and-test, policy-guard, mergeability (merges cleanly into the base branch, and the branch was 0 behind master), write-mergeability-status.
   • Re-executed both runtimes at the checked-out head: npm run typecheck passed; npm test passed 655/655 across 45 files; npm run build passed; dotnet build --configuration Release 0 errors and dotnet test 45/45 with 0 skipped, so REQ-MIGRATION-003 is maintained; python scripts/implementation_status.py --check reported IMPLEMENTATION_STATUS.md matches 30 ledger row(s) over 49 registry row(s). python -m pytest scripts/tests was unavailable in my environment and is covered green by build-and-test at this SHA.
   • All six acceptance criteria met. Criteria 1–3 are now pinned mechanically by src/diagnostics/readme-conformance.test.ts: I reproduced the mutation proof by restoring master's README over the repaired one, and 3 of the 7 tests failed (the same three named in the handoff), which also demonstrates the requirement-identifier extractor is not vacuous. Criterion 4 verified by the absence of those sentences from the diff; criterion 5 by the Not closed section making no M3 closure claim.
   • README status claims checked against the ledger directly: REQ-MARKET-001..005, REQ-ACCEPTANCE-004, REQ-VISUALIZATION-006 and -008 all read IMPLEMENTED.
   • Diff confined to the four declared paths; no test deleted, disabled or weakened (195 lines of test added, none removed, suite 648 → 655); no invariant touched; no secret, credential or local machine path.

   REQ-VISUALIZATION-007 now reads IMPLEMENTED in docs/spec/implementation_status.csv with ISSUE 496 and PR 499. Its MERGE_COMMIT is intentionally blank and is filled by scripts/backfill_merge_commits.py from the squash commit above; that is the normal path and not an outstanding gate on this Issue.

   This Issue closed automatically on merge with reason COMPLETED, verified after confirming #499 is in state MERGED. Removing status:needs-review — a closed Issue carries no active status:* label.
7. zendev-acceptor

   removed

   status:needs-reviewImplementation complete, awaiting acceptanceImplementation complete, awaiting acceptance

   on Sep 15, 2026