feat(MaskService): add Selector parameter

[ArgoZhang]

add Selector parameter

Summary of the changes (Less than 80 chars)

简单描述你更改了什么, 不超过80个字符；如果有关联 Issue 请在下方填写相关编号

Description

fixes #5358

Regression?

• Yes
• No

[If yes, specify the version the behavior has regressed from]

[是否影响老版本]

Risk

• High
• Medium
• Low

[Justify the selection above]

Verification

• Manual (required)
• Automated

Packaging changes reviewed?

• Yes
• No
• N/A

☑️ Self Check before Merge

⚠️ Please check all items below before review. ⚠️

• Doc is updated/provided or not needed
• Demo is updated/provided or not needed
• Merge the latest code from the main branch

Summary by Sourcery

Add support for CSS selectors when configuring the mask container. This allows for more dynamic and flexible placement of the mask element. Resolve an issue where the mask was not displaying correctly within its container.

New Features:

• Add a Selector parameter to the MaskOption class to provide more flexibility in specifying the mask's container element using a CSS selector.

Bug Fixes:

• Fix mask display issue within a container element. Add Selector parameter to allow specifying a CSS selector for the mask's container element, fixing issue feat(MaskService): add ContainerCssClass to MaskOption. #5358

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request introduces a Selector parameter to the MaskService to allow specifying a CSS selector for the mask's parent container. The changes involve modifications to the JavaScript, C#, and test files to accommodate the new parameter.

Sequence diagram for Mask update with Selector

sequenceDiagram
    participant JS
    participant C#
    C#->>JS: InvokeVoidAsync("update", Id, {Show, ContainerId, Selector})
    JS->>JS: getContainerBySelector(options)
    alt options.containerId exists
        JS->>JS: getContainerById(options.containerId)
        JS-->>JS: containerId
    else options.selector exists
        JS-->>JS: options.selector
    else
        JS-->>JS: null
    end
    JS->>JS: document.querySelector(selector)
    JS-->>C#: void

Loading

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Added a Selector property to the MaskOption class to allow specifying a CSS selector for the mask's parent container.	Added Selector property to MaskOption.cs. Updated the JavaScript update function to use the new Selector property to find the container. Added getContainerBySelector and getContainerById functions to Mask.razor.js to handle the selector logic. Modified the update method in Mask.razor.cs to pass the Selector property to the JavaScript function.	src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/Mask/Mask.razor.js src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/Mask/Mask.razor.cs src/BootstrapBlazor/Components/Mask/MaskOption.cs test/UnitTest/Services/MaskServiceTest.cs

Assessment against linked issues

Issue	Objective	Addressed	Explanation
#5358	Add a Selector parameter to the MaskOption class to allow users to specify a CSS selector for the mask's parent container.	✅

Possibly linked issues

• feat(MaskService): add ContainerCssClass to MaskOption. #5358: The PR implements the requested feature by adding a "Selector" parameter to the Mask service.
• feat(MaskService): add ContainerCssClass to MaskOption. #5358: The PR fixes the issue by adding a selector parameter to specify the container for the mask.

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
• Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
  an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @ArgoZhang - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

• Consider adding a check in getContainerBySelector to ensure the selector returns a single element.
• The getContainerById function could be simplified to just return the template literal directly.

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟡 General issues: 1 issue found
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟡 Testing: 1 issue found
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (56e3600) to head (5beace3).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #5361   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          644       644           
  Lines        29212     29218    +6     
  Branches      4125      4125           
=========================================
+ Hits         29212     29218    +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.