Skip to content

Conversation

@dotnet-maestro
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request updates the following dependencies

From https://github.com/dotnet/arcade

  • Subscription: 36974d0f-1ebe-4d41-3a49-08d961c5a689
  • Build:
  • Date Produced: March 13, 2024 12:04:36 AM UTC
  • Commit: c80f6c7bcfdd0e62a3012f9a97ab52be477c7d75
  • Branch: refs/heads/release/6.0
  • Updates to .NET SDKs:
    • Updates sdk.version to 6.0.127
    • Updates tools.dotnet to 6.0.127

Microsoft.DotNet.ApiCompat , Microsoft.DotNet.Arcade.Sdk , Microsoft.DotNet.Build.Tasks.Archives , Microsoft.DotNet.Build.Tasks.Feed , Microsoft.DotNet.Build.Tasks.Installers , Microsoft.DotNet.Build.Tasks.Packaging , Microsoft.DotNet.Build.Tasks.TargetFramework.Sdk , Microsoft.DotNet.Build.Tasks.Templating , Microsoft.DotNet.Build.Tasks.Workloads , Microsoft.DotNet.CodeAnalysis , Microsoft.DotNet.GenAPI , Microsoft.DotNet.GenFacades , Microsoft.DotNet.Helix.Sdk , Microsoft.DotNet.PackageTesting , Microsoft.DotNet.RemoteExecutor , Microsoft.DotNet.SharedFramework.Sdk , Microsoft.DotNet.VersionTools.Tasks , Microsoft.DotNet.XUnitConsoleRunner , Microsoft.DotNet.XUnitExtensions
 From Version 6.0.0-beta.24113.1 -> To Version 6.0.0-beta.24162.4
@ghost ghost added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Mar 13, 2024
@carlossanlop carlossanlop added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release area-codeflow for labeling automated codeflow and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Mar 13, 2024
@carlossanlop carlossanlop merged commit f9e2297 into release/6.0 Mar 13, 2024
@carlossanlop carlossanlop deleted the darc-release/6.0-939e8d93-9c24-4804-92d9-594da74dd49f branch March 13, 2024 22:41
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 13, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-codeflow for labeling automated codeflow Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants