-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5k
Add repeatCount
in superpmi.exe to repeat the compilation of 1 or more methods
#93417
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems like we shouldn't need to change the MethodContextReader at all. Instead of the "repeatCount" loop here, couldn't it be just before the
CompileResult* crl = mc->cr;
line? (There might need to be some kind of saving/restoring of the originalCR).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
possibly, the problem with that though is that the display of percent completion report will be slower. E.g. if someone pass
-repeatcount 10000
for entiremch
, the time after which you would see the console output would be after 10000 * 500 compilations.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems wrong that the MethodContextReader should have any knowledge of the repeatCount.
How about have the repeatCount loop include the %complete logging, and displayed % complete would be
repeatIteration * reader->PercentComplete() / repeatCount
. For a repeatCount of 1, this would be no change.Then, change it to output every 500 iterations whether that is due to loadedCount or repeatCount, e.g.,
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My math here is wrong. It would need to be:
for newly exposed MethodContextReader
curIndexPos
(asCurrentCount()
) andIndexCount
(asTotalCount()
)(this depends on
curIndexPos
returning1
when you're processing the first method context. curIndexPos and IndexCount also depend on there being a .MCT file, which there isn't always, in which case we would have to return the pos/fileSize likePercentComplete
does, which wouldn't be as accurate.)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sorry, just seeing your comment. One of the other problem of moving loop to iterate over
jit->CompileMethod()
is that it will be a tight loop without showing the % progress unless we add anotherLogVerbose
inside it. So for eg, if I pass-c 59 -repeatCount 10000
, i am expected to see % completion after every 500 iterations or so. Unless I am misunderstanding your suggestion of where to add the logging.