Skip to content

[release/6.0-preview5] Update dependencies from dotnet/emsdk #53444

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

dotnet-maestro[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dotnet-maestro dotnet-maestro bot commented May 28, 2021

This pull request updates the following dependencies

From https://github.com/dotnet/emsdk

  • Subscription: fbf77beb-d355-4199-2f11-08d91bccecf1
  • Build: 20210528.4
  • Date Produced: 5/28/2021 10:28 PM
  • Commit: 73901e8b1f047a8350d9d3ca7943364b13cbe50c
  • Branch: refs/heads/release/6.0-preview5

…28.3

Microsoft.NET.Runtime.Emscripten.2.0.12.Node.win-x64
 From Version 6.0.0-preview.5.21278.1 -> To Version 6.0.0-preview.5.21278.3
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 28, 2021

I couldn't figure out the best area label to add to this PR. If you have write-permissions please help me learn by adding exactly one area label.

…28.4

Microsoft.NET.Runtime.Emscripten.2.0.12.Node.win-x64
 From Version 6.0.0-preview.5.21278.1 -> To Version 6.0.0-preview.5.21278.4
@marek-safar marek-safar added the Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release label May 29, 2021
@mmitche mmitche merged commit f978338 into release/6.0-preview5 May 31, 2021
@dotnet-maestro dotnet-maestro bot deleted the darc-release/6.0-preview5-288c4cfd-8264-4ce1-8b18-3783a67414d6 branch May 31, 2021 00:16
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 30, 2021
@danmoseley danmoseley added the area-codeflow for labeling automated codeflow label Jul 28, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
area-codeflow for labeling automated codeflow Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants