Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Port NuGet Audit back to 9.0 #108854

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Oct 16, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ericstj
Copy link
Member

@ericstj ericstj commented Oct 14, 2024

Enables NuGet audit in 9.0 and fix the references of build tasks to avoid update churn.

ericstj and others added 5 commits October 14, 2024 09:17
* Enable NuGet Audit and fix issues

Microsoft.NET.HostModel can reference the live builds of the packages
it depends on.  These will be deployed by the SDK.�
Most other audit alerts were due to tasks pulling in old dependencies
that aren't even used by the task. Avoid these by cherry-picking
just the assemblies needed by the tasks and provided by MSBuild / SDK.
This prevents NuGet from downloading the package closure with the
vulnerable packages.  We don't need those packages since the tasks
aren't responsible for deploying them.  A better solution in the future
would be a targeting pack for MSBuild and the .NET SDK - so that
components that contribute to these hosts have a surface area they can
target without taking on responsibility for servicing.

There is once case where we have a test that references NuGet.* packages
which also bring in stale dependencies that overlap with framework
assemblies.  Avoid these by cherry-picking the NuGet packages in the
same way.

* Fix package path on linux

* Only use live JSON from HostModel

SDK pins S.R.M and a few others, so don't make them upgrade yet.

* Add a couple missing assembly references

* Refactor tasks dependencies

Consolidate representation of msbuild-provided task dependencies

* Fix audit warnings in tests

* Remove MetadataLoadContext from WasmAppBuilder package

* Update Analyzer.Testing packages

* Reduce exposure of Microsoft.Build.Tasks.Core

* Fix audit warnings that only occur on browser

* Update Asn1 used by linker analyzer tests

* React to breaking change in analyzer test SDK

* Enable working DryIoc tests

* Fix double-write when LibrariesConfiguration differs from Configuration

* Fix LibrariesConfiguration update target

* Clean up references and add comments.

* Make HostModel references private

This ensures projects referenced will not be rebuilt by tests.

This also means the HostModel package will not list these as references,
but that's OK since the SDK provides them and this is not a shipping
package.

* Use ProjectReferenceExclusion to avoid framework project references

On .NETCore we want to use the targeting pack and avoid rebuilding libs.

* Update src/libraries/System.Runtime.InteropServices.JavaScript/tests/JSImportGenerator.UnitTest/JSImportGenerator.Unit.Tests.csproj

Co-authored-by: Jeremy Koritzinsky <jkoritzinsky@gmail.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Jeremy Koritzinsky <jkoritzinsky@gmail.com>
Since we're no longer trying to reference live S.T.J we don't need these.
@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Oct 14, 2024
@steveisok steveisok self-requested a review October 14, 2024 19:39
@ericstj
Copy link
Member Author

ericstj commented Oct 15, 2024

@rainersigwald - can we count on System.Text.Json 8.0.5 being present in all VS versions that support using the 9.0 GA SDK?

I see the SDK is still on 8.0.4 in the 9.0.1xx branch https://github.com/dotnet/sdk/blob/0009da1479d71f7c69ba5ae8e4d0e91ef2f7e6eb/eng/Versions.props#L142-L144

@rainersigwald
Copy link
Member

No, it's not in 17.12-preview3 and I'm not aware of plans to push it to preview4+. It's in 17.13-preview1.

Should we change that?

@ericstj
Copy link
Member Author

ericstj commented Oct 15, 2024

I wanted to check before we pushed this into 9.0, I was triple checking this work for potential product fallout and this stood out.

No, it's not in 17.12-preview3 and I'm not aware of plans to push it to preview4+. It's in 17.13-preview1.

I see - I think this means we need to keep the tasks at 8.0.4 and suppress the NuGet Audit warning.

@rainersigwald
Copy link
Member

We just discussed this in Tactics but to preserve it: the current 17.11 patch release is relevant to the 9.0.100 SDK requirement to be buildable on day 1 of release, and it has 8.0.4, so the SDK must ship with 8.0.4 (for the references in build tasks and their dependencies).

We cannot count on VS and MSBuild updating by the time 9.0 ships GA.

Fix WASM projects which only target .NET by referencing the LKG and dropping all assets.

For Microsoft.NET.HostModel and other build tasks, keep them on the version we can garuntee is present in VS.  NoWarn the Audit warnings here.  This is safe because we can ensure one of two things.
1. The package is non-shipping and customers won't see the warning and the referencing repo in the product will ensure an update or exclusion of the dependency. (HostModel)
2. The project excludes the reference entirely as making it PrivateAssets (not in package) and ExcludeAssets=runtime  (no possibility of using runtime).
@ericstj
Copy link
Member Author

ericstj commented Oct 15, 2024

I made a change here. I think I also made it so we won't need to chase our tail here if we have future CVE's in 8.0 STJ. Can I get a new review?

Copy link
Member

@rainersigwald rainersigwald left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

MSBuild stuff lgtm!

@ericstj
Copy link
Member Author

ericstj commented Oct 16, 2024

Tell-mode infrastructure change, also discussed in tactics.

@ericstj ericstj merged commit 9305d7f into dotnet:release/9.0 Oct 16, 2024
160 of 165 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants