refactor: rename COMPlus classes to make a clear distinction with COM interop #102922
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… GenericComPlusCallStub and ComPlusMethodFrame
ghost
added
the
dotnet-policy-service
bot
added
the
community-contribution
Member
|
LGTM. Please apply the above comments and then we can gets this merged in. |
AaronRobinsonMSFT
approved these changes
Jun 10, 2024
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rename the following classes to make a clear distinction with COM interop
ComPlusCall -> CLRToCOMCall
ComPlusCallInfo -> CLRToCOMCallInfo
ComPlusCallMethodDesc -> CLRToCOMCallMethodDesc
GenericComPlusCallStub -> GenericCLRToCOMCallStub
ComPlusMethodFrame -> CLRToCOMMethodFrame
Fix #86145