-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
Update PublicAPI files for 17.13 ship #77266
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,66 +1 @@ | ||
| Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Conversion.IsSpan.get -> bool | ||
| Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.LanguageVersion.CSharp13 = 1300 -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.LanguageVersion | ||
| Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.InterceptableLocation | ||
| abstract Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.InterceptableLocation.Data.get -> string! | ||
| abstract Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.InterceptableLocation.GetDisplayLocation() -> string! | ||
| abstract Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.InterceptableLocation.Version.get -> int | ||
| Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxKind.RazorContentToken = 8523 -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxKind | ||
| override abstract Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.InterceptableLocation.Equals(object? obj) -> bool | ||
| override abstract Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.InterceptableLocation.GetHashCode() -> int | ||
| static Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpExtensions.GetInterceptableLocation(this Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SemanticModel? semanticModel, Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.InvocationExpressionSyntax! node, System.Threading.CancellationToken cancellationToken = default(System.Threading.CancellationToken)) -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.InterceptableLocation? | ||
| static Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpExtensions.GetInterceptsLocationAttributeSyntax(this Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.InterceptableLocation! location) -> string! | ||
| [RSEXPERIMENTAL003]Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxTokenParser | ||
| [RSEXPERIMENTAL003]Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxTokenParser.Dispose() -> void | ||
| [RSEXPERIMENTAL003]Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxTokenParser.ParseLeadingTrivia() -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxTokenParser.Result | ||
| [RSEXPERIMENTAL003]Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxTokenParser.ParseNextToken() -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxTokenParser.Result | ||
| [RSEXPERIMENTAL003]Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxTokenParser.ParseTrailingTrivia() -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxTokenParser.Result | ||
| [RSEXPERIMENTAL003]Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxTokenParser.ResetTo(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxTokenParser.Result result) -> void | ||
| [RSEXPERIMENTAL003]Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxTokenParser.Result | ||
| [RSEXPERIMENTAL003]Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxTokenParser.Result.ContextualKind.get -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxKind | ||
| [RSEXPERIMENTAL003]Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxTokenParser.Result.Result() -> void | ||
| [RSEXPERIMENTAL003]Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxTokenParser.Result.Token.get -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxToken | ||
| [RSEXPERIMENTAL003]Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxTokenParser.SkipForwardTo(int position) -> void | ||
| [RSEXPERIMENTAL003]static Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxFactory.CreateTokenParser(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Text.SourceText! sourceText, Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpParseOptions? options = null) -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxTokenParser! | ||
| Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxKind.AllowsConstraintClause = 8879 -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxKind | ||
| Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxKind.AllowsKeyword = 8450 -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxKind | ||
| Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxKind.RefStructConstraint = 8880 -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxKind | ||
| override Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpSyntaxRewriter.VisitAllowsConstraintClause(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.AllowsConstraintClauseSyntax! node) -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxNode? | ||
| override Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpSyntaxRewriter.VisitRefStructConstraint(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.RefStructConstraintSyntax! node) -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxNode? | ||
| Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.AllowsConstraintClauseSyntax | ||
| Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.AllowsConstraintClauseSyntax.AddConstraints(params Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.AllowsConstraintSyntax![]! items) -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.AllowsConstraintClauseSyntax! | ||
| Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.AllowsConstraintClauseSyntax.AllowsKeyword.get -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxToken | ||
| Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.AllowsConstraintClauseSyntax.Constraints.get -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SeparatedSyntaxList<Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.AllowsConstraintSyntax!> | ||
| Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.AllowsConstraintClauseSyntax.Update(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxToken allowsKeyword, Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SeparatedSyntaxList<Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.AllowsConstraintSyntax!> constraints) -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.AllowsConstraintClauseSyntax! | ||
| Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.AllowsConstraintClauseSyntax.WithAllowsKeyword(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxToken allowsKeyword) -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.AllowsConstraintClauseSyntax! | ||
| Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.AllowsConstraintClauseSyntax.WithConstraints(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SeparatedSyntaxList<Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.AllowsConstraintSyntax!> constraints) -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.AllowsConstraintClauseSyntax! | ||
| override Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.AllowsConstraintClauseSyntax.Accept(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpSyntaxVisitor! visitor) -> void | ||
| override Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.AllowsConstraintClauseSyntax.Accept<TResult>(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpSyntaxVisitor<TResult>! visitor) -> TResult? | ||
| Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.AllowsConstraintSyntax | ||
| Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.RefStructConstraintSyntax | ||
| Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.RefStructConstraintSyntax.RefKeyword.get -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxToken | ||
| Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.RefStructConstraintSyntax.StructKeyword.get -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxToken | ||
| Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.RefStructConstraintSyntax.Update(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxToken refKeyword, Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxToken structKeyword) -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.RefStructConstraintSyntax! | ||
| Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.RefStructConstraintSyntax.WithRefKeyword(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxToken refKeyword) -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.RefStructConstraintSyntax! | ||
| Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.RefStructConstraintSyntax.WithStructKeyword(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxToken structKeyword) -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.RefStructConstraintSyntax! | ||
| override Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.RefStructConstraintSyntax.Accept(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpSyntaxVisitor! visitor) -> void | ||
| override Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.RefStructConstraintSyntax.Accept<TResult>(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpSyntaxVisitor<TResult>! visitor) -> TResult? | ||
| static Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxFactory.AllowsConstraintClause(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SeparatedSyntaxList<Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.AllowsConstraintSyntax!> constraints = default(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SeparatedSyntaxList<Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.AllowsConstraintSyntax!>)) -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.AllowsConstraintClauseSyntax! | ||
| static Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxFactory.AllowsConstraintClause(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxToken allowsKeyword, Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SeparatedSyntaxList<Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.AllowsConstraintSyntax!> constraints) -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.AllowsConstraintClauseSyntax! | ||
| static Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxFactory.RefStructConstraint() -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.RefStructConstraintSyntax! | ||
| static Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxFactory.RefStructConstraint(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxToken refKeyword, Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxToken structKeyword) -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.RefStructConstraintSyntax! | ||
| virtual Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpSyntaxVisitor.VisitAllowsConstraintClause(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.AllowsConstraintClauseSyntax! node) -> void | ||
| virtual Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpSyntaxVisitor.VisitRefStructConstraint(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.RefStructConstraintSyntax! node) -> void | ||
| virtual Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpSyntaxVisitor<TResult>.VisitAllowsConstraintClause(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.AllowsConstraintClauseSyntax! node) -> TResult? | ||
| virtual Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpSyntaxVisitor<TResult>.VisitRefStructConstraint(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.RefStructConstraintSyntax! node) -> TResult? | ||
| Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxKind.FieldExpression = 8757 -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxKind | ||
| Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.FieldExpressionSyntax | ||
| virtual Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpSyntaxVisitor<TResult>.VisitFieldExpression(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.FieldExpressionSyntax! node) -> TResult? | ||
| override Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpSyntaxRewriter.VisitFieldExpression(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.FieldExpressionSyntax! node) -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxNode? | ||
| virtual Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpSyntaxVisitor.VisitFieldExpression(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.FieldExpressionSyntax! node) -> void | ||
| static Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxFactory.FieldExpression() -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.FieldExpressionSyntax! | ||
| static Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SyntaxFactory.FieldExpression(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxToken token) -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.FieldExpressionSyntax! | ||
| Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.FieldExpressionSyntax.Token.get -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxToken | ||
| override Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.FieldExpressionSyntax.Accept(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpSyntaxVisitor! visitor) -> void | ||
| override Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.FieldExpressionSyntax.Accept<TResult>(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpSyntaxVisitor<TResult>! visitor) -> TResult? | ||
| Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.FieldExpressionSyntax.Update(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxToken token) -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.FieldExpressionSyntax! | ||
| Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.FieldExpressionSyntax.WithToken(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxToken token) -> Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax.FieldExpressionSyntax! | ||
|
|
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've just checked that the Unshipped files are empty and CI doesn't complain, so that should mean this PR is correct, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Generally yes, but one thing I always look for manually is to understand any line removals from the shipped files. We do make occasional breaking changes, but it's good to make sure nothing unexpected slipped in.