Skip to content

Conversation

@JoeRobich
Copy link
Member

It can be tedious to determine what changes in Roslyn are relevant to the C# extension. The idea is that changes under these folders may change the behavior of the Roslyn LSP and thus impact the C# extension. PR authors may remove the label if they do not believe their change is impactful.

@JoeRobich JoeRobich requested a review from a team as a code owner July 29, 2024 21:56
@ghost ghost added Area-Infrastructure untriaged Issues and PRs which have not yet been triaged by a lead labels Jul 29, 2024
label: Community
description: Label Community Pull Requests
triggerOnOwnActions: false
- if:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this actually work? I've not see the equivalent API Owners tagging actually work well.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have no idea. I based it on the other PR taggers, but am not sure there is a good way to test.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking at docs and I think the indentation is all wrong. Will update.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Doesn't look like the formatting was that different after all. Still made changes to improve readability.

Copy link
Member

@dibarbet dibarbet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm fine with this. But definitely should get thoughts from other @dotnet/roslyn-infrastructure folks

configuration:
resourceManagementConfiguration:
scheduledSearches:

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added empty line between searches and tasks

Comment on lines +30 to +31
- description: Auto-approve auto-merge PRs
triggerOnOwnActions: false
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Moved description and trigger to the top of each task to improve readability

- if:
if:
- payloadType: Pull_Request
- isPullRequest
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added isPullRequest filter where applicable

@JoeRobich
Copy link
Member Author

Gonna get this merged so that I can test it. If the tagging doesn't work then it is an easy revert.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Area-Infrastructure untriaged Issues and PRs which have not yet been triaged by a lead

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants