Declaration name completion recommends an unnecessary difference for nested type primary constructor parameters

[RikkiGibson]

class MyWidget { }
class C(MyWidget myWidget)
{
    class D(MyWidget my$) { }
}

Expected: name myWidget is recommended.
Actual: name myWidget1 is recommended.
(I'm not fully certain if the behavior I am seeing for class primary constructor parameters is intentional here though.)

Compare with the local functions behavior where myWidget recommended in the nested/shadowing case:

class MyWidget { }
class C
{
    void M(MyWidget myWidget)
    {
        void local(MyWidget my$) { }
    }
}

[CyrusNajmabadi]

It's not intentional.