Allow to ignore entity types and properties by base type or interface #25025
Conversation
src/EFCore/Metadata/Internal/TypeConfigurationTypeExtensions.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| else if (!dependentEntityType.Builder.CanHaveNavigation(navigationToPrincipalName, configurationSource)) | ||
| else if ((configurationSource != ConfigurationSource.Explicit || !shouldThrow) | ||
| && (!configurationSource.HasValue | ||
| || !dependentEntityType.Builder.CanAddNavigation( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
CanHave vs CanAdd? Does latter verifies that it is not present currently?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No, it assumes that it doesn't exist.
|
Hello @AndriySvyryd! Because this pull request has the p.s. you can customize the way I help with merging this pull request, such as holding this pull request until a specific person approves. Simply @mention me (
|
|
Apologies, while this PR appears ready to be merged, I've been configured to only merge when all checks have explicitly passed. The following integrations have not reported any progress on their checks and are blocking auto-merge:
These integrations are possibly never going to report a check, and unblocking auto-merge likely requires a human being to update my configuration to exempt these integrations from requiring a passing check. Give feedback on thisFrom the bot dev teamWe've tried to tune the bot such that it posts a comment like this only when auto-merge is blocked for exceptional, non-intuitive reasons. When the bot's auto-merge capability is properly configured, auto-merge should operate as you would intuitively expect and you should not see any spurious comments. Please reach out to us at fabricbotservices@microsoft.com to provide feedback if you believe you're seeing this comment appear spuriously. Please note that we usually are unable to update your bot configuration on your team's behalf, but we're happy to help you identify your bot admin. |
|
Apologies, while this PR appears ready to be merged, I've been configured to only merge when all checks have explicitly passed. The following integrations have not reported any progress on their checks and are blocking auto-merge:
These integrations are possibly never going to report a check, and unblocking auto-merge likely requires a human being to update my configuration to exempt these integrations from requiring a passing check. Give feedback on thisFrom the bot dev teamWe've tried to tune the bot such that it posts a comment like this only when auto-merge is blocked for exceptional, non-intuitive reasons. When the bot's auto-merge capability is properly configured, auto-merge should operate as you would intuitively expect and you should not see any spurious comments. Please reach out to us at fabricbotservices@microsoft.com to provide feedback if you believe you're seeing this comment appear spuriously. Please note that we usually are unable to update your bot configuration on your team's behalf, but we're happy to help you identify your bot admin. |
ghost
merged commit 
|
The value conversions article needs to be updated. |
Allow to specify a value conversion and other facets for all properties of a given type
Fixes #3867
Fixes #10784